公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

云山水月

公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周
1 j& @3 n# U2 H8 a- b' |- Y. t
% N3 r5 p+ ?) E, c其实这个规则未必人人清楚，但是有投诉只好有处理。
# \( U- P7 N# \' f# N9 w* h$ f
我决心判下去，还在于被告的发言在这里颇不妥当，煽风点火的味道很重，不单单是个禁言期间发言的问题。
" o' q! w* ^% |: H6 _/ I3 J
http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

/ T0 @6 R$ p. {9 P6 z6 C2 mplease look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me then you will know that i didnt go against the judge.

云山水月

原帖由 xiaodou_112255 于 2009-3-22 14:31 发表
.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

5 X+ l* n: o; D) H8 G9 vplease look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me th ...

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
& P- d( r& h' E
只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

无敌魔羯

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

! V/ w# m5 n1 X朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

' v' @. _( y/ I8 r0 L. A/ Y# R只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

" d+ X/ j; U8 C) ^" r5 u3 s; r
好像两个案件弄混了。。。
朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

/ \$ e! ?! S0 r" T1 H朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
$ o- D1 z" I9 r; V
* ^6 g( N4 P( g6 d7 V3 E' |9 `只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

+ `' s  r. T! F& T+ K4 ~haha, you need proof to prove the suspect guilty. how come if the suspect cant prove he didnt crime then he is criminal????

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

she could say that i am teasing, but where is the proof??????

云山水月

原帖由 醉清风 于 2009-3-22 14:35 发表


好像两个案件弄混了。。。
; b( f/ Z5 F2 n6 T' P- C朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

because we are talking at the same time, so i didnt see your warning until i posted my reply. i will not say anything in other poples topic but only my own topic, thanks

xiaodou_112255

up up