6#cactus_2009 / I1 l1 t9 T* D: c+ i# Y* h& C e) Q: V 6 W2 E9 S* p4 M$ H6 J0 A/ \This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 ) P& b9 {! [" @' ^) U# A7 @ ! X7 Z4 d/ @, b8 i, [! d4 p/ ^" Y2 IThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ..., ~- d' @5 {+ G0 c& u
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
, A; E V- h* y5 |" R& q4 U
5 _& x% J) a+ d# l: `
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?1 p4 n. `8 x+ f
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
% L Y* Z8 v7 I. d+ w
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.