鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
No difference, indeed.1 z: U/ L0 ?! _& O. l9 w y+ M
3 ~* e7 c1 B; j& ^$ o3 \, MSee, if you spend 30 min. to take a photo with a cheap camera, then spend 5 seconds for one photo with an expensive camera, which one will be better? it's a no brainer. Most of the "photographers" don't think too much before taking their photo. 9 Q' _1 |8 R1 F$ }1 X8 B- L
' X/ {; s: X) Y, i4 I' k. e
If you are not going professional, D90 of Nikon or 50D from Canon should be fitting almost every needs you will ever need. I would lean to Nikon D90 slightly because it offers pretty much the same or above the 50D with a $250 lower price tag.0 z, Y% E% L7 q$ m1 ]9 c
) J+ U7 o/ T! W, H' r6 B7 xThe other thing is Nikon has so many legacy lens on Ebay, I recently bought one for $150 , 50mm F2.8 Micro, one of the sharpest Nikon even made, the image is sharp like a razor.
7 p# {* m/ l* b w. ^
8 _/ Q" Z; o/ F) kDon't think too much about the brands, simply go to DPREVIEW.com, check the sample images of D90 and 50D, if you cannot tell the differences, go for D90, by the way, most professional photographers cannot tell the differences or don't care. |
|