 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
9 I: m+ M7 H5 k& T/ t* X% i0 {6 V: ~* t% p z( P& z1 t$ |
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。3 \# r/ H6 v* @5 H$ N9 `
7 F- j$ ^5 Q: o( x
**********************************
$ U; {6 s# |6 F/ r0 \% O; mAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
/ B$ c4 a$ H6 B2 f8 I! [$ H; G6 G+ J6 y* @; N; J) H
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.! N) o- g" G {' a4 w( q
. _ d+ x9 V* t- b# ~2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
9 p7 O3 G- @; \" @ b X
% z7 @) T- ^: i0 Z2 m& c T3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
( z) m0 \3 N2 X' ?8 P/ K( N! ]
* R: h$ q8 ]/ ~/ u( m( E4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.- Q0 i, O5 k7 ?& n, _9 V9 [" e/ }$ L( j9 l
5 m) W/ n" i2 e. |
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|