 鲜花( 115)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 年轻的心 于 2010-12-1 13:52 编辑 7 u7 j# h" ]: f8 f
4 _. N1 e0 W H2 U: v
2010年12月
, L' J; k6 b: \1 |Bank of Canada Interest Rate
4 H" {5 }) @# [1 ^
. p8 _9 t/ W, E; i# h | | September 8, 2010 | 1.00 % | | October 19, 2010 | 1.00 % | | December 7, 2010 | Next meeting date | Source: Bank of Canada2 L) u- `4 y9 K9 ~* F
\9 m- p; Y/ [+ \# z
! E( ^# ]1 N1 i# }3 r6 [Bank Prime Lending Rate
" d4 _) o, I7 K8 T- a+ U7 i- y/ D/ I$ a$ L# A* E
, a* ~1 |, K8 ~) z1 {" F( L
| September 9, 2010 | 3.00 % | | October 20, 2010 | 3.00 % | | December 8, 2010 | Next meeting date | 3 f& d! h2 E. s' B
Source: Bank of Canada8 |5 Q0 T' G8 U t9 B
( m) x2 Y* H* D( O) h9 K# u5 b9 P( P% b! F
5 m v" Q% W ]! }
4 V S3 ~( e7 X4 DConventional Mortgage - 5 Year Rate*
$ {* p( J# N- a7 G, }8 u( e' j, v8 W: v& R' z
1 j% T# q s/ y. y
| September 15, 2010 | 5.39 % | | October 18, 2010 | 5.29 % | November 29, 2010
: Y% i, i+ V" [7 G$ o( I5 c2 e | 5.44 % | K* a4 h9 ]7 z7 k
Source: Bank of Canada3 b% ?* i9 x/ n1 B ]) {- q5 H- Z
*Determinant for high ratio mortgage variable qualifying rate1 m o) f) N$ r3 F- N. {$ o
# c: E: Y9 m+ D w! n. d1 V* i2 Y
7 l5 `! M+ [" U2 M- j
& H% _& c% ~+ M& M5 s( s8 i1 L" s
N4 j( Z2 |/ |US Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate
& W: A. M& b2 f9 S; I" p6 d& q0 o
: w) \: ? I' T0 z. P$ Z {; v6 R6 Y% h- l
| September 21, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | November 3, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | December 14, 2010 | Next Meeting date |
- A4 j* \# T1 u) H' E/ H: HSource: US Federal Reserve. g! Z4 b/ y, w7 M
^" K' w' G. v- k
! @ N+ N: l: P5 R
$ q1 N1 L0 t7 o2 I7 f
2 L) M$ |' M+ J8 f% F1 P I+ Y
) A- n T2 c' X2 s6 NExchange Rate $CDN($US)5 c) E2 c( l0 {+ W$ U
| October 28, 2010 | 0.9790 | | November 10, 2010 | 1.0000 | | November 26, 2010 | 0.9804 |
4 H& F- ~4 `/ @Source: Bank of Canada+ e" Y: \; ^& N% I& l2 n
- V& w1 q) i9 r" G: o1 m- m4 t) F
9 @- A1 Q: t( ]
& W0 Z# ?" z- k& u/ L5 b
& E5 z$ p4 H* vGovernment of Canada Bonds6 o4 u9 X4 x1 n# C; i5 q( R( P
" j% k' e# W0 o+ A
! ]& r" t0 }1 w. A| Bond Type | October 27, 2010 | November 10, 2010 | November 24, 2010 | 1 year Treasury Bill ; Q9 w$ Y% W! N1 }* y
| 1.21% 6 D6 _2 Y5 L' v& o, k
| 1.27% | 1.39% | 3 year Benchmark
% r' r! B: c9 }- e U& ^Bond Yield | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.94% | 5 year Benchmark
* x' T& g* O& R. \Bond Yield | 2.06% | 2.20% | 2.48% | 10 year Benchmark9 x+ W+ e8 k( c
Bond Yield | 2.89% | 2.98% | 3.19% |
8 u4 X- L# `- D3 D. i/ ]# YSource: Bank of Canada- a+ W* J" W+ c4 ^ \
4 T% m! G2 g; D/ D, g* x& V
, s3 W) F" M+ }* K& Z% r
' e0 s8 w6 w% \$ g1 _ S& ^0 U1 F) l' P% G
& e& q. _0 d; t$ Z9 ]Total New Housing Starts (Seasonally adjusted and annualized)' z) K: `6 S- t! {( I$ v6 ]: g
Province
/ e6 a: s3 p3 Q1 c | August5 s) ?/ O% T0 o/ v" Q1 P
2010 7 H$ U# a6 u5 D" a; E9 w' \
| August
T1 P, B, J' l) h" Y0 z' d+ s% E1 l2009 $ o$ |1 i' u* i
| September0 l- l( H* g! t5 y+ n2 [4 f
2010
) T# R' Z! j; o3 b+ b | September
' Q+ P% @3 ]3 V" @9 u! n% A6 t$ [2009
8 p5 K8 C! H. l7 p* [3 A& K | October) l3 l2 Y1 C: e' V6 p) y
2010 $ b4 ], e- U+ o1 t$ I' o
| October: I9 A: M8 z% p$ l
2009 & t& i( N6 K7 d2 @
| Newfoundland/Labrador u' T' I t _ B5 p
| 3,500 $ |6 V1 s3 F; @: Y, Z) L5 V0 `$ s
| 2,400 $ x/ c {5 G9 H0 ~1 L
| 3,100 + H8 Y) W* Y+ _
| 2,800
3 U9 W4 h6 y/ q, H' M/ } | 3,400 [6 `+ s: Z. A7 s3 P) U* N
| 2,900 , Y. Q% M( |- X* V- G$ K' T2 p
| PEI
8 M, P0 u% _; i8 O. t7 u! I | 1,000
( I; n& W: p- K+ v | 1,000 - L' u5 o! l9 g" {: w+ g
| 500 ( _8 E7 e& s/ t6 x! F
| 700 ' ]) F% i& G! r/ b
| 400
/ M2 l6 o0 A0 F% d# o* l1 E6 P | 1,200
1 x+ e( U! w8 B* E& u; |1 J( ^ | Nova Scotia
& L; O" p2 R! x! Z N | 3,200 & B* Q+ L) T! U
| 4,200 + M1 c) m0 T9 U2 q
| 4,100 - O) S U, d6 P' K0 M
| 4,500 $ q6 R$ `# }2 s7 X; f
| 4,700 3 {5 [+ t3 N: W2 O
| 4,000
& {1 y4 b5 y! R) f+ O | New Brunswick+ w9 r$ s$ p. k. M: ^
| 5,100 7 I4 J' Y; k7 C+ ]! W! d! S0 C
| 3,700 4 e" C8 E" j- [& w9 z
| 2,400
( Y' P8 s% _* J | 2,900
. m! F4 J6 }* n | 4,900
7 Z4 I$ O6 {# z1 B* ? T5 T | 3,600
u' i* G) J) p- m% T | Quebec
5 t6 @! o# h) T) r' I% W | 48,300 2 ?6 E4 q" t4 S3 v3 m5 o8 {# w
| 47,300
5 _7 c! r3 {" A& K | 50,700
/ P# R" B7 g W | 41,300
) @3 R2 {2 u6 c& ~8 J' [ | 48,600
2 C& C9 f8 a4 ` | 37,200 9 Z( g3 E) ~4 _( \, j/ q! x; v& K# V# @
| Ontario
; j9 k# z, D7 J7 L9 U! R, a | 64,800 2 _# r' N6 y% B
| 44,200
" c( W& U9 G2 y: z, C | 58,000 5 U8 M+ W7 _$ r, R" O' N/ f
| 50,200
9 _2 Z$ |' z3 p$ P | 44,700 " Z' f/ q B; y0 { Z8 Z
| 57,600 + k. T# I d1 l. M \3 R! J
| Manitoba. y. _$ G. {' W+ ^ x9 S" q
| 6,100 / `* C# Z' r$ `. q: u( ]3 G$ u
| 5,000
+ H- m1 _( Y: ^9 `; E | 4,000
* B a% t, b7 [6 j4 C) X0 N | 4,400 ' x, W& S4 ^8 d5 V. d
| 3,800 ! d8 j: x; Q! B: R* ~' {7 s
| 4,200 & V) k* g6 g3 @3 r4 ^: B& h. i3 C
| Saskatchewan
$ C3 U% S+ u4 @( a | 7,700
0 a0 @6 a9 F% q" @0 r7 C | 5,100
, p8 y% t9 N) O+ K7 X | 5,400
+ Q% d% c) q1 G" c8 U$ k | 3,700 , ]) w8 }$ y# k: n' C J
| 4,700
; A7 y6 C3 z& X# i6 Y5 A+ q, N$ E2 t | 3,600
+ i0 s+ b/ a0 y | Alberta
( n0 v& \9 Z4 {$ ^$ z5 e9 l3 ^ | 23,500
5 x% c7 N' ^ {4 f: |9 w I* V | 18,400
, J4 \! e* j9 S' @1 l' E | 27,100
) Y0 o$ V, e( G+ f; V0 H8 n$ H( B | 22,600
/ U1 Y) X1 Q& C8 \5 H | 25,200 ; Q; O" j8 G o/ {7 @; J S
| 25,000 % O4 z$ }* H0 x7 [( S) q1 d b1 w6 n/ {
| British Columbia' d; N7 I2 G* T3 x- Z: l- G3 x7 ]
| 27,800 1 |' ~; l6 {, m& n6 g' Q. N) N5 G
| 19,200 - b8 h- V: q/ B+ n; E
| 29,700 * Y$ W" u+ @) P; `2 |
| 16,200
4 x: i( s( [! T# e2 Z- n# _+ ] | 27,500 1 d. f m1 Z. K! F
| 18,200 * r5 ]9 p% h9 r* V+ Y& R
| CANADA& q! V/ ~8 Z; d3 E I/ Q
| 191,000 * }8 m4 u! n1 D7 y3 M! s
| 150,500
8 }9 b: G% B6 `8 e5 g, l* b# l3 F | 185,000 0 I. I# v7 J3 u! p$ A8 j5 ~! o
| 149,300
, Q. ~6 e. x; w0 d5 q0 y% e | 167,900
, O9 h4 k! u9 x | 157,400 ) |, m0 }. H, \3 ^
|
7 I3 n/ J- A8 B* e. e5 a" VSource: CMHC Housing Now - November 2010 and November 2009. This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the the year.
q' U7 m5 O* R. y; W
6 J) z, Z1 z j7 S: [. F2 e; B5 k% [. k6 {. J$ W0 A" \9 o
# a# d" q1 S1 k/ n4 y0 _5 S
( A7 `, c. A: V5 m" x5 ~: {
% O+ z/ B3 @5 J9 h# r
Average MLS® Resale Price for Local Markets2 c; d3 }6 V- T, y9 \
9 G6 k8 o9 d @/ }; S, E) B
& P: C. t- S a| City | October 2009 | October 2010 | | Halifax | $235,465 | $248,678 | | Saint John | $178,632
* u4 _2 Y- u% V/ ?0 \& C4 p, S' x7 Y | $165,032 | | Quebec | $219,440 | $246,918 | | Montreal | $285,100 | $309,638 | | Ottawa | $320,561 | $305,872
' X/ v+ W- U, f9 T% S4 A' v | | Toronto | $423,507 | $443,633 | | Hamilton/Burlington | $296,253 | $305,872 | | Winnipeg | $210,618 | $229,467 | | Saskatoon | $274,759 | $293,929 | | Calgary | $393,574 | $399,679 | | Edmonton | $351,768 | $317,096 | | Vancouver | $638,948 | $707,207 | | Victoria | $481,500 | $343,747 | # F8 m# `4 f& S, l7 x0 v- D0 t
Source: Canadian Real Estate Association
) S4 [, ]. x1 f# k: G* G% d( h1 M% l0 {
- \9 ~" X4 h& y) @0 ^0 g N# j. }9 S, d
1 B' p8 k: h L' a7 }! q1 Q
$ @6 w2 \* C; W2 AQuarterly Housing Affordability Index
, B3 Q! J) f( G, e( QStandard Two-Storey # T7 g* v8 V( c; x/ K0 B1 J
5 l8 h0 H* n8 `: s1 j9 V( z | Average Price
) w7 a+ z" E0 b; |/ m6 x ]5 ` |
# m$ u* f5 c( }5 v) S( ? | RBC Housing Affordability Measure
6 Q+ B; {" I8 d) | y, u1 c | Region 9 R( y# w/ A0 j" w0 e
| Q3 2010+ A1 F8 {5 }- d+ y! l, _3 w
($)
9 |( |; o2 v1 i6 [& m | Y/Y
: |. z. v! P$ [3 O2 a7 c% ch.
3 q: |4 v- O' T+ m | Qualifying - u% O, Z5 }9 K$ n
Income ($) 1 @' W5 S# M- z: }$ Y
Q3 2010 9 `( C7 U; c4 X' n8 k( f
| Q3 2010$ M8 \) k( d7 E+ Q' O, Q# H* q' f0 v
(%)
O- _3 I( F0 V- E, Z | Q/Q- \! _6 m5 k. c; x) e
Ppt. Ch.
# M% h K$ ^& f! A" N | Y/Y" J5 ?& o$ t2 z7 ~) ~7 F9 A( l
Ppt. Ch. ! Y: d! ]3 [' z/ p
| Avg. since7 A- G0 |5 s% d" ~% o3 Q
'85 (%)
1 P( ?, H1 H6 S4 L, Y( Y. d2 N | Canada
: {4 C4 b7 h$ ?3 z1 @ | 370,700
8 R( _% l3 v4 z! c) w, d | 6.3 2 H3 |" n; v( Z }& u
| 83,100 ) F+ s' M3 G+ ~. _% _% x2 [
| 46.3 5 j* }3 i. U+ W) ]- j
| -2.5 7 k% g- K# \9 }/ y7 B2 ]; Y/ [
| 0.3
; i: C1 t% E/ o: N: t: G9 w% k" V | 43.3
: V" h- @! x. W8 _$ q | British Columbia
" A. d$ s4 A6 |3 n( M' Q* z | 624,800 4 E8 T3 J, Q# N! W. ]# P
| 8.0 ( C5 @+ D& G5 U, ~
| 124,500 ' S) c2 ^2 R! d: ^/ D2 v% }
| 67.5
+ D! a8 g Y, O+ g | -3.9
) F1 n9 ~% p, {% f0 _# k! D | 1.4 : ~9 b( J, e0 e: }- C
| 54.1 0 L- E9 v3 E4 X( Y2 H( _/ x1 U
| Alberta 0 j+ k( R- Q5 r2 S1 t# C- y5 ~
| 365,600 * @; [2 p/ b1 X
| 0.1 : P [) ~3 _3 I6 ?6 J2 v" c
| 81,400
! o2 M3 Y F; L | 35.6
9 u1 L# d8 i A4 C% I& J# Z | -1.8 ! o; j& h" M* K9 m5 Z! G1 k
| -2.0
9 ?1 T c# {; B) c6 g, q s | 38.6 ) ~4 R* x: ]1 ^8 f2 m+ Y/ o
| Saskatchewan 1 p; p+ U# i1 Y0 O3 s% [1 m
| 315,300
) Q0 W* Y! ]! { | 5.1 ( e. d: O$ @4 O
| 74,100 : U D# ~: |2 D& Q3 u4 j) l6 {
| 40.8 {* h1 u7 Y7 v4 i' S/ O0 w
| -2.2 $ h2 a! p0 H8 L
| -1.1
1 n" a, y ^5 X' R7 H% W | 38.0
. F/ `) I J" T0 }$ f2 Z# T( X+ p | Manitoba * G9 h! U% u3 i( K/ Y0 U9 ?
| 269,700 ( r: z( s8 Z A0 e
| 7.8 4 S V7 j( n% c" z
| 65,000
D: L, X# e: i6 d: p/ S. M* t; f9 @ | 37.1
+ J4 [: n# P5 m U" k | -2.3
- v Y/ ~6 B, y* _ | 0.8 # X( P. K+ b3 w( W
| 37.7
9 Q$ p( O$ ?4 E& _& k | Ontario
$ w9 }5 H7 n+ @ I- I5 N | 388,200 6 F4 L9 N0 c5 ?2 x4 g5 h
| 6.2
! X/ P, R& p1 I9 T( B, ^8 t | 89,800
* W" P4 P( \% S | 44.9
6 S3 Y; ^2 F5 y- X' [ | -2.4
- B& N( ]+ }- z S9 q/ ^ | 0.4 , i% ?' d% X$ F8 ^# e. m, Q8 P7 U
| 43.7
5 L: [; z. q) F' R | Quebec - p7 P8 A* \. ]/ n
| 262,100 & d$ K' R, Z G4 o
| 8.6
; i3 j7 C" c0 ~$ B/ V) q | 61,700
9 n) D" o& q- b* I* Y | 41.7
! R/ Y1 F" S3 Q# W8 O | -1.8 - U2 D# w: U& @$ v$ ]7 m+ |3 b
| 1.3
" r, ^2 m) ]! s, E | 38.8 8 }$ D3 ?8 O% U7 _. ]' g0 S* H
| Atlantic " t9 c9 h! @7 {
| 222,100 % ~) U$ b& G1 B" I# ?# u
| 4.3
: n1 ~/ p5 D } | 55,900 & i- U8 d( |: t/ [
| 36.5 ; C7 K. H4 `# {7 b# r7 h
| -1.4
# y6 ?0 C Q; b- ] | 0.1 / X& d* o! C) A6 i
| 38.0
# r* O5 e ]$ w0 j {! } | Toronto
! D" M$ {! Q* t. ]& R' { | 554,700 + f1 ^) q" d7 p! |; g, S; k; t7 U3 Q
| 5.6
& k3 c' K+ e4 d | 120,400
" z2 {6 V7 P' b* g: \/ b | 56.2 8 w$ O) h" a- v/ U
| -3.8 % E) q0 H- E# M; K
| 0.1
" G1 U8 k* }: ?& n* @7 B | 53.4
; I& E( A, B+ b) a! v | Montreal 9 S( P; O" c s) V5 V
| 335,300
' o7 A5 `; t! V | 8.9 / p; K% e5 j! x: E( ~5 ?, W+ w
| 75,800
" w& I3 H) Q$ U6 C" o) e: a0 I5 K | 51.3 s, g; z9 W! ]8 [1 B$ B) I
| -1.7
) m. Z! f+ E1 c! E9 K! D | 1.7 # \4 R* m: t3 F" D s; N
| 41.7
+ ]* n- g* n$ Q- `; @ | Vancouver
* [* ]* ^( l% S+ E7 B0 @' O$ @9 F | 766,300
% Z) J( Z3 G$ f | 8.4 8 r5 X1 I1 C' r( x
| 149,400 ( w0 u& ]2 X' Y! i
| 78.1 3 C3 n: y i7 G4 q9 u
| -4.7 9 [5 i C* x8 m, I9 |
| 2.0
9 ~2 t" O: W: g1 F3 [3 Y; w! ] | 62.6 C" T1 w5 T' M6 ^8 x
| Ottawa
. E9 X$ Y4 p0 D+ |: c1 x7 _8 J" o | 350,600
; j X+ {9 a% W( X. \) n8 ` | 4.8
1 r% A3 F" f: M$ t1 v- } | 86,600 - M" ]% ^# H* ~. r
| 40.5
6 \7 Q& R, S; ^* d | -2.5
: D& ^# c( T$ z# z/ U. _ | 0.0
& R, U& D- E. }4 q$ U/ Z$ g3 {% V | 39.1
: D5 W8 c0 o4 `* h# x7 l3 ?/ U& V | Calgary 6 H7 E7 K5 R+ t! A F
| 410,500 v9 j1 ?- }/ _0 q
| -1.0 # O4 r/ b v) d, j8 B
| 86,700 ; x2 E5 _# ?1 D
| 37.9
7 M' a" N6 H8 _' q$ J( m | -2.3
! _3 M& T7 i2 }0 |6 j" Z | -2.6 : k/ |% i$ U4 R2 T% ?
| 40.3
% u: S; I" t8 I8 F k | Edmonton . D& J/ D; Z( N
| 362,500
X4 A S' P6 a# {1 [ | 1.2
: V& j" u5 F5 P% G/ D1 y3 Z9 s | 82,500
. N/ h6 @( X) v: G | 37.0
* e. _2 q1 E7 H | -1.9
: m) f; Z9 ]5 G& h Y0 V( I Q' b | -1.6 - B/ {; F7 o+ p l, h
| 37.0 , Q( d$ E. p2 h9 m
| 6 k, J4 {* C2 Q, y! j; g
Detached Bungalow
% A# n. z( A; e | Average Price
$ C$ U5 I9 F8 D* L, o | 9 C$ T2 }- `) F( F1 U8 [- _
| RBC Housing Affordability Measure
+ E$ c2 G2 U, o- e# L& W. [+ r | Region
# H3 R6 O9 S9 j, B6 e | Q3 2010
E% H0 t$ ?* D+ l($) $ I0 ]- I0 I, m) Q& ]. J5 Z
| Y/Y
' c/ P! J1 K5 J% ch. ' o3 ?' P: @( b
| Qualifying 9 B! E& y1 G3 }& Y! u2 `5 s% G+ B
Income ($) 6 Y! `8 m1 s( q$ m
Q3 2010 & N, y/ E8 E' j/ h* x; t: N2 i
| Q3 2010
8 O8 E3 Q, L& L5 u(%)
% k6 G* a8 B# ]) E' o6 l | Q/Q
$ c3 g$ X9 j0 N8 R- ? Q: y# QPpt. Ch. $ \. u( s5 r4 E6 l5 [: W+ n( {
| Y/Y f7 `. H" v3 P3 V1 u) d
Ppt. Ch. 1 }" F. d+ u9 l) ~1 t* \; s
| Avg. since+ X s* J. |( L9 r% X' f: V& ~
'85 (%) 6 q3 G9 ~: R+ N- J. }
| Canada
: ?6 v+ _: U" Q" f$ D& ]* J | 325,300 ) u' p( q* Z& s/ Q. Y) X
| 6.8 2 g3 c7 R T! e, u8 C: l- s
| 72,500 ; }% D( S# v2 j- G1 ~6 P
| 40.4 k. d+ y) t1 u% `0 ] B& a
| -2.4 " Z$ H* M8 V4 Z1 |+ A) x$ Y
| 0.3 2 @- U3 ?2 X& W1 G' T4 M
| 39.0
9 C% v3 q' ]" @ | British Columbia
& k: S# Q+ J8 S) i7 ` | 544,700
' y$ h" H) |, A | 8.5 - Z/ h& U% E V' p
| 108,800
/ j4 p5 M f( M0 P | 59.0 ! _& F8 A- a. z% M
| -5.0 5 u4 h! Z2 k$ |+ `. t2 j& ~
| 1.5
" ~9 ~. S: b- C; b% T3 ]$ A. ` | 48.9
5 I- J4 {( v$ [; D r* D | Alberta
# c; Q" W4 }6 i- j | 340,500 2 T, E) f& K; I
| 2.9
. K! R" ~7 ~! e* {3 A | 74,400
0 R+ ^* p0 @7 ^ | 32.5
' g2 n4 X0 h; n4 N | -1.8
8 E( W: W9 P4 V6 _; j0 G, o | -1.2
* Z& Z b: k' Q6 L5 T+ k4 H | 36.1 , T, `( [4 C+ P0 R, r
| Saskatchewan ; w3 {; _5 U. t0 h
| 312,400
6 M% ~/ W1 J; P6 H9 w" I+ W | 6.3 d3 q9 p6 c6 H4 D% I2 a
| 70,900
. b- r! Z% E8 u9 A: C, w | 39.0 e4 x! g' o* ]; Y/ V5 `: M
| -1.9 " O, z4 s# g! Z+ k3 D+ m' r
| -0.8 U+ U2 q- H+ j! L
| 36.6 0 u& G4 q( H6 ?8 m# \
| Manitoba 3 m4 _( [: v; Z2 C; {; W, K; {: E/ |
| 251,000 : y; p4 N& b. H7 E
| 9.2 ' {/ {- O5 v9 i- Y6 @' A' I
| 60,800 ( T; ^) F: u) W
| 34.7 . n, }, o+ N- ^+ O1 c' ^5 ]9 f
| -1.4
: @+ P/ u z, G/ V9 E! N* A | 1.1
: L* H' I- f/ M9 h3 N& E | 36.8
/ X2 U4 C' Q2 V9 s% E, P | Ontario 5 i/ O7 r& i, C. \" A
| 337,400 , p5 g1 }6 K" A6 i/ J
| 6.1
$ d5 p( Q$ i* V) n% J8 R | 77,900 9 i5 }4 ^% L8 J
| 38.9 ' q. `4 d/ ? a& J& u
| -2.2 # B% r9 T% R# k$ c j0 N
| 0.2
) ^" m7 K- ^1 t7 G/ U/ g | 40.1 0 N! S0 A% Q: W2 K# g- }0 o7 ~( ^
| Quebec
7 v, ~$ N* Z$ t) \* d | 221,600
3 c- h, D- j; B- s1 R1 R; x1 G y | 9.3
( o0 W, l8 D& d! G( l7 X0 [: p$ q | 51,700 ' \2 b" j* c5 |# J# @8 W; r8 g
| 35.0
* v) R x: H$ B' P6 V) z | -1.4
9 D/ P$ D, C0 d( z | 1.2
+ f7 u* W! L6 n! v% E2 g | 32.9
- z0 K/ w0 G9 c' l5 X; i | Atlantic
! R" b' \! v" q) t1 B$ F/ M | 196,600 * |% f- \8 _2 o: {. e
| 2.3 , ^! w- c& o+ @- |0 d
| 48,200
6 g* b' A+ @+ j v* c+ f3 T8 n | 31.4
3 o$ A6 ~$ u4 n | -1.0
3 a1 N5 W1 }$ i/ T( E | -0.4
: O+ V; u3 A% [0 N- u) e4 k | 31.6
- t- A, L+ F5 ^5 P8 Z6 a" \ | Toronto
& i# w' {% S: t# | | 466,600 & M1 h, j' b" q8 N% I" s1 b; r
| 5.0 1 h2 }2 T, m S( f5 N, M
| 101,100
2 k! V" f& x$ @' @8 q) [. s | 47.2
# B1 H: H( {# A) u2 F, J | -3.0
# {) q/ `0 ` I t% X | -0.1
+ B- D+ z3 ]; v* Z1 L | 48.2 * k1 x/ j3 s9 }7 m, v5 |
| Montreal
: V1 x- v0 N; A% w; R | 271,100 * L6 p1 ?" y2 T8 N
| 11.8 / M1 W t& p4 p0 d4 i5 Y$ ~5 P* j
| 61,600 * r2 R- F) `* {# x( B4 V
| 41.7 , J' h$ `* e8 D/ ~9 G7 X2 `+ A
| -1.3 . y1 D0 |, {( U2 x, P; i
| 2.2 $ E' l2 }/ x" V4 W' G' s( s
| 36.9
0 K _* q; |$ v1 C | Vancouver ) z" w$ ?! f& \
| 672,500 % Q+ p! q( G7 w' o% }* r0 ?7 @8 m
| 9.7
! H+ l: f! n/ l8 f6 B( _: U | 131,600
; l4 q7 ~9 [: q& [) v3 W7 x | 68.8
- J$ r: U2 C8 C5 O | -5.4 ; h) r$ E2 f" v* b
| 2.4 ; i1 {2 G/ V2 h* s4 W: S
| 57.3
( x0 n' }) l1 `% j# `, F | Ottawa
4 D* O; m/ C' M; Z7 g0 e7 K | 340,800
- D6 Z% R. ~+ V* ]! D4 k3 d | 3.4
- ?# r; |8 E$ m4 w; K | 81,800
, ^) x* z3 F& ~ | 38.2
+ B+ j0 t3 p& H% X" Z& u | -2.9
. f9 s& v, c1 l1 d3 M! U | -0.5 $ c3 X& F) S9 [" i+ P4 y" g9 I
| 36.6
2 h7 f5 A+ E/ s* q5 H N S | Calgary
6 c3 \/ j3 M7 g$ u2 [ | 412,700
% V$ P5 _9 W2 |6 Q4 `* P( f1 e | 2.7
, e0 S% D Z+ k- l | 85,00 " X' `4 l! X5 \6 Y
| 37.1 . x A: A! k0 K; c/ u
| -2.0
9 m" \1 Z+ F% @ x# ` | -1.5 \6 e$ e$ e7 A3 ` c. i
| 39.9
3 w, S+ A3 b3 w! [: | t) k8 x! t4 {' v | Edmonton
5 R0 h5 c# ?; |( u9 W; N | 322,900
- a/ ^( R/ F! X | 5.4
0 Z9 x' y% V! A) Y8 N, M/ j | 72,900 & _. m7 G' T# K
| 32.7 3 Z( v7 S/ R% h
| -2.0 ( c% q8 I* J' }6 u4 R* j% B
| -0.5 , F7 _8 ~! o# R+ b1 u
| 33.9
& i C: m6 ?+ p) b | & p3 P; l9 p& h6 l
+ P. W$ ^- X8 O% \/ k
Source: RBC November 2010. The measures are based on a 25% down payment, a 25-year mortgage loan at a five-year fixed rate and are estimated on a quarterly basis for each province and for Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver-metropolitan areas. The measures use household income rather than family income to account for the growing number of unattached individuals in the housing market. The higher the measure, the more difficult it is to afford a house.
, k1 P$ r# B1 v4 A7 @* ~2 C4 l1 P2 t
; u- Y0 c0 q9 x* k. i3 @2 }3 J9 ]5 ` |
|
| |
|
|