 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 ^& {7 z" F% ?7 t2 J4 b
+ y2 |9 S! y8 p( }; v+ q6 v% s- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* ` I# e* O) @2 d
4 m3 _$ N O+ r- N9 c, S) @% o
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market3 ]0 a) Y1 O1 v4 }% d1 U9 t
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* e4 N. H( f+ B' ?. \% A6 @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. U$ y) S/ K+ B6 Z5 [in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# t& [* R( {) K6 I8 v) W# P. O
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and8 [0 U% w7 ]; g
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,, b; d+ F" H0 H- n4 d7 i9 f
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
& `1 _7 G/ e) H: H) v" nLePage Real Estate Services.
) ^% R; I/ l) b5 m- G+ c
Z8 B9 C" P1 p, Z/ o a. K. G Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters4 m8 N7 j) x$ d H# |1 h
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! B! z& ~+ i( r# Q% O
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 o$ [; @! p/ X+ w; c. Rsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 O6 I7 M' d& J# N- {, Z3 [+ r1 hresidential real estate sector.6 N$ c6 x* e+ p
6 F- B O& r: m# T X1 I, M3 X
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation. r: X5 r# h6 Y- T4 J+ ?
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" x9 V }+ ]9 { Vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562 ?" B1 V* p) T7 u4 f" P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 u" x: a0 Y K$ [) j. n' L
(+13.2%).3 w/ g8 \/ a3 u0 q: \( I
, Z! R' }3 w/ K& `" Q2 | "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth- y: G2 D5 k, ^! {8 V' h! v+ a
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
6 y+ R/ s$ D, Q; [' Efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. o/ K8 m4 m) `9 ?$ N
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,+ j2 O3 x2 u" n; E0 ^
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% `3 [$ C( z+ T9 H/ \7 ^/ a: z"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
" \& Y) z$ C6 z+ a* E) Dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, J7 t2 V& l+ O0 Lbalanced market." a2 D" S W3 n( ?3 v
0 H+ W; N# _, z4 E) ?$ L) m- \
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,7 i4 A8 l5 x# w9 M3 I' Q
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* u5 W$ X; n9 i7 P9 gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 B+ {2 J: ]. | Y6 f3 ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
0 E+ B! x j4 G! `, l; t5 O; ^energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
W4 B$ G4 P- z' [3 ]- @% J/ I0 {, _/ vmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
! O7 h6 e3 x; {# V8 L: O2 [breaking price appreciations.4 c3 @8 i0 S4 v/ k2 F
/ Y4 B6 ?' R; } J; W
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 L% y. ~ v) P4 p3 ^ \5 ceconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
' P6 p. f* O! h3 b( H" s- p# ilargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 a* f) j$ E4 [( \, I
% i* }# _& W# t# o" D/ o
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ B0 N; l% a" W# |, U: o) `
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 U" c; n; z8 H1 [8 Q# y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) R3 @6 Q/ G% _2 O' zslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 {7 a- y5 M1 E* Z% y5 J: iIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers _0 n2 {; M$ l2 T Q0 w6 ^6 {
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ I/ N$ X: U9 }price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 K7 U1 b, W9 f% ?: E9 Q
. F- t) }* \4 e9 h0 c6 G) W/ D While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
c+ F/ b0 \* x& Q0 fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: r' r& P4 F* M5 i# n# k7 D
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
$ ]5 p; q( o) z$ F% i/ B: `* oare markedly different than those found in the United States.
( o* X6 r5 z [* {0 V! b8 B# Q, p; }: w7 c% \$ c
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' L7 Q/ a. ~# h0 e. I9 VAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 H0 E" K0 @# a: T- \+ y! hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the4 k/ L7 u0 \9 x* w J
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& B7 B+ _0 s. d3 P2 o
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the( O! N2 I+ k4 X J X! r* C
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 M1 T, t6 N' Z% p: ?9 u# b- R baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 A: r5 i1 \# _1 u6 nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
4 T% y0 Y6 E: f* Q! e; X& X4 o0 P/ ?; w; c& R) @! H
<<
4 H* Z5 ~/ t1 Q* x7 _ REGIONAL SUMMARIES! O& Z+ X \' p d$ V4 K) ^; n" G2 o0 n
>>
0 o* H( \. D; h i( D1 ?& N) X6 t% ~9 {4 d1 r
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 N' ?/ {" v4 _! l( ~; d; jHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; z0 U3 Y- |+ \ F% T2 j: k
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& f; U, U- t% O4 q) Y' mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
1 u" c; y4 l# Zrenovations." B$ x; [. C* Y- z9 K* B+ U
7 L0 R/ e2 D5 a) D The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 G2 N8 O8 o& r( O" X z1 r+ kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& X0 m" a- R% K" @( _" xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 n# G. O1 g3 P5 z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 X+ w7 p J7 n( e6 [8 \! _* q1 c
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 L- x q; L- _# rslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 D3 p. ~+ J0 Q- H2 u3 E7 ~" @1 S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 A: ^0 ^4 ?7 D W6 p/ m' }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 E G* f! y. I! _* r* Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# B- S. ]2 N* g( M% fand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 S# Q! ^5 p: t1 @( l9 ^
! }1 z1 |& z' h K2 V In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, ^) ]; P2 L8 [+ Xconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 Z5 z+ g% U' l6 K/ J6 j9 I6 J
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
* P3 C0 u. c- f$ F) m- V: {4 gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian6 u H5 d: l5 e- |$ m, m- G0 ?8 ]0 ^
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing: q' ?8 X# `1 N7 i9 e, Y5 j
buyers with more options when looking for a home.$ ?+ f8 e9 L3 K
/ F4 X( K& f) {2 q# a. T5 o Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
# N1 e8 u' w0 t8 famong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes6 q& \8 l& I/ D) [# s4 K
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" E% [- q `4 J0 c( Uas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ x, g6 `* C; A5 Jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* l. t, T5 h' J
9 ?( ~$ D% W0 ?/ X; Q8 B9 r- p0 a# Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
+ c. Y% [# I2 F, I" sprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" }& o, s) p' t* q. Vlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting" o( \- x* d* Z* ?8 e% j9 b
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 g+ G' ~6 E% r( {5 u1 pwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
* A7 z# W" N& [' n' i) Ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
9 j( p+ |3 _ w2 o. Xmaking a purchase.+ ~; t) s5 z$ u, O6 U# @
' M# S5 a# F- B8 p) C Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing2 n" `0 ~: h( \3 L* @: s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong" h& e2 x, W; O7 s
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
6 y1 V$ K& V$ j5 H- X$ x l, i; Jcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ v$ B4 o3 G! E0 z" R4 aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( @# p& @, z. p4 Q5 B3 c
amenities.
! Y# O* D K2 o& O# N1 B# N# G/ t; h( Q5 F
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels9 a5 L ^8 b) w0 l/ F6 c
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 Y$ G/ r. U2 B b" [1 p9 f$ C7 |! Jacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: h! s5 E6 r9 ^% `1 c/ Z! W/ R3 }, D2 z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
M, P* ?) m7 n& G6 Pdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* C0 F* g8 ?5 b, l* s+ Z* W" fresidence, rather than for investment.0 H4 v4 l& }, L
9 [$ c5 a) y( R, F: H
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 ]/ q! [& N' I" b( v1 z" nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted; Y) a' l B7 e E4 X0 t3 R
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ j( b1 j5 v% C' O1 e2 Jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* F$ s* X# [8 r: S4 b% `! v
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 w+ `' b& i" i6 {" `+ Lthe market.
, B" t4 |$ O7 a2 H p G9 Y% P
& i4 A" X9 q0 f5 q! Y- j, | In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; f4 T! q6 m. h# ^5 r e
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
5 E1 [" V. Y3 B6 r9 nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 ^7 I% q. K h1 k2 Tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
: A; Q7 |; o0 ^$ L3 t0 Z. A, Oto the shortage of available inventory.
: n Y+ E' y5 p1 h( Z
5 ~6 Q; b" R* D# T* t Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 C3 H! `+ ? P4 q# X6 T% Pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 c2 T4 Y) V% q# N9 u0 _8 ]8 pvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
" l3 M4 f7 }" y/ vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.$ Y8 E) P- ?$ P0 L; f
$ V" @! c6 n, \4 y! Z# `) P
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% I" E( G) K: h! V( E5 R
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ R8 ^# h( M4 H/ j* I2 l4 R/ t7 L- G
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that: ]; _) t8 u1 n _+ c A
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 S/ f0 p- R+ i3 c8 h$ |) c7 h
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; i$ s ^" H" |5 f4 _; K- `: u8 Iseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ k& u X8 R( W8 v
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.* _/ w6 f: b3 X
' ^1 |+ D) w' z1 N- f0 q8 ~ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
. m0 {6 i% g# q) ]3 u( `' t0 fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 z7 ], L8 ^! h% c# vremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 n- X- z) i; D6 _) B4 D
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; \, V$ k' W$ P' k: |% ?: _8 ~
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* ^' ]% N* z& S
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
% x. ?( B2 {! c" ptowards the end of 2006. 3 G Z! A- l( d7 L
3 f8 O4 v( ~* V5 H' a/ x0 L) |While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 {# T: R- ^( y @7 pinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable9 \, C1 K9 {" \; Z* _/ U7 B6 M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 @8 K" I" q, x9 j! a6 d/ \group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% Z0 g" h% Q& Z* A
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ \* V9 J1 N, Kpressure on tight inventory levels.) U% E9 t2 [' l) @+ t
- U9 X; N8 ]* D& A Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
* K- Z0 W u0 K. S9 E) Bfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, k' p! F$ f3 p+ a3 F* Einto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 }" S0 W+ T& j3 d) d* T" K1 W$ zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
. e8 Y2 Q! @* n( j7 ^for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ r; l# z- r5 J5 t2 v7 Q
) g2 c* A; Q% a. c) B( l) d
<<, H. L& r4 l; W
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006 n) t: U1 Q3 \8 ~' R5 o
" S6 N" k N: X6 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. ?" P7 M$ a3 k: k5 h2 V
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey7 ~1 h" }4 S8 q) ~: @' ?" j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 g+ ?4 I& m6 C5 B7 L 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( ^- i; A# h" q; c Market Average Average % Change Average Average
4 D2 B5 Q' t. w4 ~% ]8 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------: {% k. V& ^2 V& J1 _
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0004 [& f/ o2 E* N% F3 E8 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 \1 {! a* ^" ]# a; _% B Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
& m% J4 L' |+ ^* y -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 h; F a x: v6 R( g
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000/ m) z# {# N& H9 p0 u8 V' m; a* R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Z+ q! M6 m! e' k% C
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -: n, O2 Y' F9 z9 B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( K. @5 `* X) h
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
9 r7 M2 e& f. P8 F+ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ l# |! r% o; C* q2 V8 [4 g* {
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5835 x8 F( ?# U' p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' O$ K1 i7 i* n6 o
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1852 G$ r3 E- N, |3 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) O0 x: o% b0 M Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
3 T0 k* {2 ~) ?! @+ \3 {( ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; K$ O6 w8 |0 l& G Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
$ k" y( s% u8 T& P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 `+ [& p/ K1 z0 x Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
+ E" b0 C, e/ N0 z5 o$ Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" V/ j2 K0 _+ l/ D5 w: e Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500( k, p$ ]2 u$ \* C( y+ B6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 K7 W+ I/ T+ w$ m* O6 i Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3893 X7 l# M P s' L0 y/ U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, D' S4 p8 W; S4 e Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 D. b) ]) V4 w8 X; s+ { ------------------------------------------------------------------------- p# c* K4 K' O9 m8 A9 S
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 G; R* W: b, V, e% j: u -------------------------------------------------------------------------" Q3 g. }$ T% F9 B
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000: w- C' Y0 S. Q7 Q2 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ e7 d: V* K* ]
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. r4 k! l# q: S$ p7 D A; a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. J* s0 n+ l; H8 o2 Y+ q' ^
% g9 g* X: C9 w& X2 f6 {1 R7 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
- H9 B, Z( t5 v* l# u- f Standard Condominium
! q2 r9 x$ z& A# A# @# Y* j -------------------------------------------------------------
% [/ L' w) k& w 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
; L# ]+ X8 w0 G( r g Market % Change Average Average % Change, t+ t8 N* y* j
-------------------------------------------------------------
& _- y3 O: u- ~' w5 [. O Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%2 b1 w% `" X% q: W
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 W( P6 c+ q* s6 t Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%6 x$ D6 b* j/ x0 g& b+ I. m
-------------------------------------------------------------# A e: E P4 L
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A) V+ R; z& _6 E5 k
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 V) j* e8 D( j( K* X Saint John N/A - - N/A4 Z: H# ~- Y! _; w* J
-------------------------------------------------------------3 U' K. e2 ~, u; Y5 C9 f
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( R8 p7 V. \4 S6 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
( C. E7 C! O0 A' K' s Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%( |, k3 g0 a1 N% S- e/ G
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 g7 l7 ]. d/ r) d% f; u% G: L Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%; F2 U3 W) b, |/ b
------------------------------------------------------------- n8 D/ t4 ~: Q/ c
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
. i% V& Y: K" O -------------------------------------------------------------
" U0 z0 I, T* k+ u5 K y+ E% Y B Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
3 A. {/ L' |9 t ?! { -------------------------------------------------------------* @! b* F6 p) ^* ]. }; j
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' U% }1 ^- K( Q/ r
-------------------------------------------------------------
: a% M- g5 P8 r; H" ^9 c# s Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%0 W" s# G+ Z5 W% J: R6 D
-------------------------------------------------------------4 q. T( G8 Y7 A0 J' r$ t) q
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
; e8 j e% U% ^, n) F, z. x u7 c; Z$ t -------------------------------------------------------------
+ C0 F- i0 f- I! k Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
+ x9 w/ H& M7 {& M -------------------------------------------------------------9 c* C, h$ ?6 V+ B# A
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
( U9 a9 I2 ?( N/ ^, K/ @ -------------------------------------------------------------
/ d% I7 `4 u4 ?1 h1 v3 W: b Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%3 z( Q N% h3 [/ y0 R+ Q7 s
-------------------------------------------------------------1 e/ f2 l `6 k
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. {; M- Z( h J8 `( s# w -------------------------------------------------------------7 U3 h3 n: J h' {& T8 K4 n
>>
( G1 t# P+ s5 h% Q
/ F1 @- f7 b* L Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 d+ B9 [6 U1 f8 g( n/ R
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: f/ ?2 {$ J6 h& O
John and Victoria.
B% b$ C! Y. }2 [) n( K! ?
; a' n( @9 z7 B) ? The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& f% J5 B! v) [
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
6 {$ {. h. z o9 Jhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
; \4 X0 q6 {- d1 k0 z# u6 Rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# K% B+ F: ]+ ^( K2 strends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 m9 N" i e w# C# h1 d
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
, j v( r" R6 Y/ p4 Javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current1 Q! X3 F6 k$ }$ P) @
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
5 @, e0 Q8 _- f- [version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on" _7 j. {, `7 U4 F0 s8 ?% M
November 15, 2006.* V/ |- \5 {; Y2 O- u/ k
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of% C4 S l, |; Y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. u( d" W% U9 z& h+ r
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& P, k" Z" Y* A! y( S$ {; ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|