埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2579|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 b' u, O6 x* X% I1 ?. Z3 k

; t$ p1 E) F! l) w2 p- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
: q6 O( }1 X: a3 `  R0 n9 `4 j* o# M8 i
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' Y) @: t  G* U: @2 Z3 L" Rexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# z% o+ ^+ s1 S
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. {/ S8 B! P, ^$ tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit9 O2 o, Q* I( `
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 A4 o( K. j+ a3 d8 E: t6 w
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,7 G+ R7 S7 k, G2 e+ k
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 u! a$ R& P1 ^1 N" o
LePage Real Estate Services.
% ?3 N& Y' E3 r/ k4 f6 e; a' k# s( V* K3 \# h, ^4 P; B8 A2 e* h2 y
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) u, o' V* b; ~' r4 c. hare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ F* J6 y5 y: ?1 o  r4 ?, iconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
+ K% a9 s: M8 R" Ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) V9 ^# {7 e* D6 a6 ^8 v; B
residential real estate sector.
( ?9 S7 S9 x2 z* ^5 G4 b2 x0 g9 G* p: Y
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
* X1 E" T: \$ E+ x+ N( poccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 g) n) B) z' V7 N
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, a$ ~  f) a' M. s/ D0 H; k! i- O( a' p(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380# k/ P1 I" W5 ]2 n
(+13.2%).' ], j9 P7 H: h/ Q7 T
8 r! x  \( A  x* m, n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 \3 e- f% g$ g: s; V# Iduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 s' i! D0 ?8 l9 O2 V
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are: x% \4 A2 f% W' K4 l
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
7 r" t% c0 [% J( o# Ypresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.# y' o) `: {1 x
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 E( m/ E4 O4 w0 uwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
0 E% v% Z/ x' Q; ^# _balanced market."
4 f6 Z6 M* {$ ~4 n5 k3 h, s$ _2 ?% @5 A
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
9 d2 ^; y: B% j* s0 u8 C. i; Bconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ L) J) [7 }8 T
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued: A' T+ T3 \: {; i6 K6 k* G
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
$ |* ], V. W. x; venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ j% w) u* L8 Q: b3 ^# pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ n: Q/ I% X4 W3 H. D$ ~- x/ Tbreaking price appreciations.
/ e8 q4 R/ t- `6 }6 n! \" u6 i
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding  l9 \1 v7 {2 y, f
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( W+ U. g% h& O2 g! c
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
: W6 a7 l1 q1 I1 Z/ s* Y4 {
# ]; y' ^: T4 b    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
7 ?1 I; D0 e* j0 s* weconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% s6 T5 p: ?! E2 B  d2 V) S- Fconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off. D. j$ \9 r* D# j4 y
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" t4 y7 L( F* vIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 y& G  Q; S: i+ w( @% O1 i$ ]' rgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; w6 p2 a3 z6 Pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.) n2 p7 V2 S. [
, a  A. W5 n( z# p5 t& m( e7 g
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 @' Y/ b$ O  p- Y% N0 V0 y2 z% }market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, R9 M  N0 k, d/ ^, {
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* p& z' T; _9 f! [+ F5 Y3 {. r' G
are markedly different than those found in the United States.6 q: J- G/ I6 ?) o' u& I2 [# h: F7 P
, G+ }4 f' j  [; H
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
  h) C! F9 e, }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. v2 u" p: \' Z. G  kfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
+ X) R& Y! N; d' k+ c- P' Brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& ~( i/ H4 I( E! taffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 g2 E# c* S7 G) T& f8 o7 \
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and) J! k  j1 G1 {
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization1 t1 \6 J, i$ m4 O' ?# A
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) G( u9 e4 i  |% \' Y+ W
1 V+ ^1 C0 f! M+ D. Y0 A    <<$ v% ~% Y' @8 r( F
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ q) T8 f% c1 c& F  t/ R
    >>
: u& ^5 _+ q$ n- B% P1 u9 C3 h; s4 D" P" \: n$ Q* l5 W  p
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 B$ T! |7 c# C+ S5 BHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
/ F9 O( q( H, s  x- C; h+ Gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) {$ \# {8 N8 }' P' q* S/ x; Zlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
  p. l( W5 u" k7 Nrenovations.$ ~4 r0 a" M$ v* z6 h; K
8 F3 ]5 U' D" G
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% o$ F9 D+ N! q2 W3 Xincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
0 Y$ ~3 V# t; b) R1 ?  jcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# A- }0 Q. l3 Z  G2 iSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 j! r- O2 f% K/ t+ r. m
+ f, w5 O" X+ B6 H( C- N3 ?1 q, S
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& U6 V% d1 X2 g) Aslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the; |* N) W( ^6 K/ s0 u
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; R9 g6 L5 u0 e% m. ^: T: t: P
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 Y2 A+ }+ Z% O/ fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
  o" Z+ y2 t" A; x6 C8 ?and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 ~- Y1 G1 o' T9 b9 _& b- f! ]
0 }/ f8 z6 S  z/ e; d
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- t$ Z- n) p' h  k8 ~/ ]conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 y5 q+ X* ~  _; O
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers* b% X5 j6 B& d
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: k) R, s4 ~+ _' D' W3 K0 V% S
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
7 ]' e3 e0 z2 \# @4 h3 _" e9 {2 {buyers with more options when looking for a home.: b$ m* ^! j/ ^3 @( r$ r
# F! K+ J9 h3 b! X
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
( _; f1 i$ P' `) L* camong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' I# z; \4 M, j3 D0 Rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," U3 @, |, v2 ]
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 o! M5 K, l) x0 l
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." j" |% W, V4 _5 i' X: T

" [  F1 Q; d* `7 J: J8 B1 d; }1 b    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; ?1 y9 e* g/ w# P# _9 n; F
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 u, E- E' d, T  N' @' J1 }( D; ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
: L& ]5 r7 E' F0 K2 T7 Yfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ ]: p) m, ~1 ?1 Iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
* k  C  C4 m9 d& {5 D: Rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% E+ i/ x# ~  v9 e: wmaking a purchase.
) A- d' z0 k2 @& f4 O2 H( \$ `# _% s4 L) ^7 \
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, U+ ?6 U* S5 Z; smarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 N) O% P! G8 N% {0 r* s9 ~# yconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
6 H6 E. w" Q! w5 ~" t9 bcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting' @6 i; G% V# a3 n+ w
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
, |+ \+ `& j- K2 n8 C& damenities., c: @) A+ m, P
  N, b8 S: H9 _' ^8 u
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels+ K2 P4 g: a5 E# O# x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand1 [6 p2 k8 m4 [/ |( Z/ D. P
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 Y( X0 y& b- C: i8 G1 o
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
5 u- n) g) g  C9 adriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle" _* l6 a+ z7 i& T
residence, rather than for investment.' L9 {8 e4 P4 \+ `
' e/ v5 ]0 A4 d  a& ?/ t% v
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as$ W% l" S) t. e# |* ~7 R# ^, a
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) F" ^9 T1 m9 p0 W! X6 t& U
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer' k) q. i0 w! ^  M
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization/ j9 b& }/ A, b/ }5 p/ \) }6 `
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter: O5 ]3 H2 \6 l
the market./ c* U" d- ]9 C$ c" R
' W4 F* F2 u1 U1 ?$ a+ [% M
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
( D- Y9 i2 d, b7 JJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In' c8 \6 j1 V0 b# r, |! v4 E  T
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 T+ h- W7 `3 K1 x' }
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
' _8 p$ [+ R+ t/ |9 A1 Hto the shortage of available inventory.8 z" u, w7 T* S) t* w, \: K5 {7 u

4 P; y) \; n) u% M/ h, U) G7 |    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
/ m% y% Y6 p: ?. emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( C, I9 ~& ~& M% K4 m- `vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
+ Q- ]7 D4 I9 Z6 Gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 ^' `2 }% ]# J0 [8 b) j! E2 Q3 K

( |9 A& ^5 O6 M/ n1 u    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases/ C  o6 f/ H( u) A4 G; i
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 i" B/ R+ T4 d- d' U0 F6 _2 I+ B! Sunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ B9 }7 Q' S8 K+ D
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( o# L; w' T/ e; B6 r1 Q- j5 V
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- d6 d4 R& {$ G& e4 d$ Rseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ ^) Z# `+ B: l9 a' N) O3 Ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" k' A, X! J  }( m. R: |% i
8 ^; V  u+ ?6 g9 T9 S; g2 O
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 z* ]' R7 [; p1 ]) P: S9 p/ xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 ]2 g1 t# n( a! E. F" w- mremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 e4 i9 {9 W" D# L
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) O/ t; t& T& a# k
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 W* ~9 \4 P0 ?1 ^
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: t9 B$ |. a8 R. k0 g1 `6 F/ Jtowards the end of 2006.
    : q+ C0 J1 L0 J" t0 I; o
( ^$ C6 V( o! C' }
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 ~, K7 e8 C  ]. h3 E# T
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
. _/ q* A/ t2 T0 K! t% Wto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse! @, }$ |8 B) l
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 y7 ^. N% U5 h# h& C+ ^' ]7 m. Bforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" t( v8 E1 a  q  c8 P
pressure on tight inventory levels.7 j: h! K: |3 Q" ]

7 B% |0 j. v( J4 H0 C    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
2 t, H* ?" d3 k% t4 i9 Q& l9 ^fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
- b' a& u0 n9 i" Sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( E5 P- J' \0 G( w+ G& k% }while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ {9 c3 _8 w* A/ `" L6 ^* D* u
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 q( p' b% N. \8 V, L3 h4 x
7 a& ]9 X. y- P" E
    <<# ?, d! w2 s" _& d; r9 l
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* t, W: u) N8 h0 s
, s! a8 l, g+ J- l% n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' f' w) r" ~+ o1 u; h% t
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
6 m0 F) F: ~( l% d- H# G, e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 T$ z5 f( S# m5 K
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
6 h  U' z6 }5 Q- g/ S: m    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
4 J, a' W+ W+ r- I8 A0 q: C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 `7 p5 N3 j+ i6 G    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
2 F, p( w; {; p% k" z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 I! T* m8 g7 @9 D1 U: J3 l  r    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000& V; P7 O% n# A0 V9 x- l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) Z' J4 `, u- a5 ]) ]0 W
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
/ X; E+ F+ o( m; m- S, z) i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ w" d4 W, h# m( }' i; u' u    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -3 k# }) A3 g4 N( [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 x5 ~7 k5 p$ s: L    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3331 P5 M. N8 f7 g0 f/ t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. Y7 n! H* U' _8 J. `, B' \
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 s) T+ A" Q/ x3 o3 }& r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' l# i8 \# b1 Y) V2 X    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
  s1 i3 `3 h9 _) [7 ]( B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n. Q1 `$ @5 d/ u: x. Y. w
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250/ Z( I7 U, _8 n6 }1 U' T$ [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ^3 S) `- ?# f5 L" L
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
& o0 V5 B1 @$ j/ ?. R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 U* K( c  i) s9 p7 u6 @    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
% q! c1 {: P* {5 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' p' x. A1 G% i/ X5 @    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5005 J, j4 I! [. a& g4 i3 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ e$ c2 i1 g# x2 e4 z. z: ~    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. G# a  Z! j% g. d' f) o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ A  @# y3 H, ?0 Y: y3 K
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
2 s* f, r4 j. S8 h6 I- @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 l; M/ B; [+ F5 `    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
2 n* U: j0 g( |2 B2 H* W4 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! U( t5 W$ {1 `; Q; p
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0008 L3 w5 E6 S: C5 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; a1 L  M# j  ~0 y! K    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8608 k/ L8 [% j) _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 d( L/ r* J7 Q7 Q6 }3 }

8 ~1 @( E9 n, d    -------------------------------------------------------------/ _% w% U( E: e! ^$ @: X0 d
                               Standard Condominium
% O! m( @5 P9 \1 J    -------------------------------------------------------------  e3 a: y: `# q; k+ i7 ^- _5 n
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
# Q+ T/ R  f2 Y) v/ |    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. L& B" V! e, F0 g( r( q$ Z! y    -------------------------------------------------------------3 `. \7 y' s! Y; d! Z9 m
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%& i! X' F& x. U! Z& k4 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 M2 ?7 s% R1 j  R: l# a2 r    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
1 c1 G  l3 h0 S: c$ m    -------------------------------------------------------------$ d# s2 {- b0 ]$ h  s
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A1 ^+ Z1 {' t$ X- Z' z) c
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 m- |" _$ p: t) ?9 U
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
+ W- q! e( S, u* k9 C; S    -------------------------------------------------------------
% G5 M+ u( J  W( z% f+ Q5 j, y    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
2 B9 T0 B  U. @" U% \# {    -------------------------------------------------------------. R1 J9 o6 }1 f: Y6 x0 S' g% k8 v
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
+ w% e+ c  z, o5 ^8 f  m& p    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 ~+ S/ L1 t8 c* y  B& n* E2 Q6 \1 k    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
3 F- a7 t1 a! N+ j    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 Z( t4 i* c) d; O! r# h! O( [    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
7 z4 z7 r/ M! u+ O- k    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 `% B+ d5 D" ?    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%! I) w: T9 f! U- ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------; _/ n) Q5 h7 n
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
. H7 t4 m2 R; t% r! q    -------------------------------------------------------------* T# g. a) D4 m8 e3 s! S
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
- G. t* V8 U  A& [/ Y' B) ]% ?& G    -------------------------------------------------------------0 a7 K, P- L, X
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
6 `; Y/ L; i5 ?+ Y) r2 b' n    -------------------------------------------------------------7 G7 q/ ~" h/ W9 O" P8 q+ u
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
# c9 n3 X7 @) p    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 C) j) W0 m4 H! V/ d5 ]    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
' q+ q; H$ M7 [) v9 h& f    -------------------------------------------------------------& K9 X; R1 w; s/ r% z4 `/ ?) k
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%% ~4 {+ |0 ^9 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------: O9 u: R6 x+ c! F" S8 @
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
' o- F5 H7 i" N1 F; }    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 j. t; Q3 v9 I% m; _; ?$ n" p( J' ]8 b6 W    >>
! O7 V' U$ ~# t$ F$ c8 }! x- f* Q9 v( H4 c/ `# `
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" p/ v; G" t4 Z$ E, o8 @4 Zin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
% A; E% Y' c; {  QJohn and Victoria.
& b5 t; N1 b3 ]' J( |+ P; b/ \# [! _) s7 L7 Y) q
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
- J5 i% u! k  ~; D5 t6 j# Jcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
+ {2 S# L, P4 fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) N1 X, w9 C  g1 l% Y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( a* t  v4 n% r3 Wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities$ w& x. y4 r/ c
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
8 a- t; G1 ^& X: }) R  P& aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
% N2 A% X. I, w! X0 _0 Wfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: W* z1 E8 O" @- ~# l' w; o
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on0 |, f& i( N2 G
November 15, 2006.+ I3 N5 {8 F( m2 N
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% y6 \# O+ S0 bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; W/ z1 O5 ]$ r/ Eprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ S: P, Y" z3 W1 t6 _0 w, I
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-19 20:32 , Processed in 0.171852 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表