 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & \( U4 l( }$ s" l6 f$ [5 [
0 }9 G7 _/ W. q2 Q- [- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 G" |* k1 D2 ~2 y, h! O1 Y8 `3 {
+ o S) j4 t& t! b9 Q: i TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
8 h7 c' s( I( _exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third6 P2 j3 j# G* Z7 q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
! ?, r4 S4 S1 S- Din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
: C1 W2 `8 U$ G0 p7 j: Zprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and8 `" h, |5 r- _! x- ~1 B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 a8 D% y0 C- S$ i" M7 ]5 ^Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
, v5 }8 Z5 O( q& m3 l" Q, ZLePage Real Estate Services., U' u$ T5 J& P$ v+ I1 ~4 |
# G+ q2 Z+ j2 j5 M7 L ? Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& v$ W6 ~, |4 O- x8 E `& {# x5 m. m4 Z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! D; R: n9 C6 ~: h
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and( R: Q+ {: ?0 S, A# D2 y
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# I3 S* e' j+ A: m! k. G$ uresidential real estate sector.
2 W4 u- b9 B2 B K' ^1 |* A! f/ M* u1 o: G- V
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation1 p, S& w1 I$ H: ?8 e! q" c
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)2 k7 @" O& t1 T+ Y! b, b' o! L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 ], x1 u1 O. b
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- J/ ?* h3 p+ r1 w
(+13.2%).: T) w4 B) a. p* B, s4 H& o
7 o( ~. |. J2 B+ ?. \+ f7 D# E "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! V5 _: o& N0 |! ^during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
" q4 l; z# [; Q% Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
* U& T# n$ o2 C# X' Spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
& p$ ? d V# H: i Cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
6 X" j2 B7 G7 J4 h& _"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( G1 e; s' j) p8 f0 M# n# lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ A1 b8 J7 R2 ?balanced market."! U& E( t) t% P5 g6 g8 \( M
* s' {# h: [9 |9 i1 j( b. g" D
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 J8 m: T% [) pconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ _/ D4 h+ }+ k9 ?( dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued9 t& P3 _2 x( W! ?) \- W4 z$ ]
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
# A+ D$ m* I; H& W: l) Y* S4 h$ \; _energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,$ t9 I% B0 O/ u
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 R; `" o, Z5 c0 lbreaking price appreciations.
8 w1 L* _- S2 s# K. J
- j, ^: c/ a; F, K. {/ Y$ B Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
; L; k- w8 v% P! N( heconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the7 e! }: t" e- W: M" p0 W) h
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.- j$ c2 |- o$ ~8 a
V' W0 y, T# X2 c
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# A6 ?$ I" k" w. L, Ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* Q6 S. C( ], Z7 s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off" b# e* k( r. C6 n8 u- E
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 N% ^2 l8 B k4 G/ U/ B/ hIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
7 g# G* b7 X% pgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
W: k6 B, P8 z9 k' E Pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.$ O; o/ i2 R; i% f2 F" h( _
' s( l: t5 I8 P4 M' w; d While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# Z$ L* e* y! N% r
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and0 |# e" l7 b7 l4 x4 {$ U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; a% t0 j( h, nare markedly different than those found in the United States.
. \7 N" M, T. k4 `4 k0 s( w1 Z! `
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the% ^5 Y( W+ y2 d3 r7 w. \
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's. o! t! V- g0 [$ C
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ d- W7 R& w/ Erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general3 D$ r9 A+ w9 F
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; ^/ T2 f5 |6 d" H( U$ X- x% i0 p8 X
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
* M8 j1 m9 O" d! @3 P1 H* `' n0 laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! p; N/ P9 b8 emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
* {2 | [2 q. Y- }$ q; {3 g0 J# K( t8 ^4 X" v
<<
! y8 w7 R" B3 G9 v REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; v7 k' _) t+ ~" ` [4 U0 ] >>
8 L% o- ]+ }' {- d/ {
# E0 d& J" g% S# E: a7 ]- x8 _5 _4 r Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
! C% d- _; p @; e6 }Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 `3 Z) m" q; ^% B& ]. \4 Aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
0 m& O# B' N7 @0 D$ tlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! c/ m3 q% Y5 E/ _
renovations.- ~) o: l! j9 m' I$ N: r+ G" W+ C
! h8 }: G, G+ h' A! n8 i The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 g3 F9 p% _' j% `. `. Mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
8 s! ?* ?" ^" j0 Qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 U( |6 ]7 C3 JSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
9 ^% N8 d1 w# U B$ p$ H6 {0 e# C5 X
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer7 k Q# c# l( [
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 r( f# H: n, ~" ^. A3 \quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( {) t/ O4 |5 ~5 S( ]
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores8 K0 P. ~+ D) K0 e. D3 T6 Y$ ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 }9 ]! u3 ~- V' R8 R' | Mand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
`( k& R9 p8 _# f' H6 O
! k& {. U, L8 ]" G. q2 M In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% Z& {/ Z$ q5 Y G
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
+ C; n4 q/ G/ i4 ^. A3 ~1 vhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; { L \( t8 X% Kwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( k$ p* x: s7 s0 ^8 ~8 W$ s! D1 g) c
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing8 @5 u a' i4 h
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; D2 L3 _( f3 m6 t; ?8 P- x# X1 t6 y# |5 i$ [: V# W, U
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly( g# B' |# i. w( x1 ^. }( y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. O# [! v2 c8 m4 C! c$ f
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 i0 P' Q1 R3 }0 R9 r+ {
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last- E3 r8 g4 G0 N% w
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions./ \ s* k/ {3 d, g4 N0 R% W
5 a' \7 [7 K0 V& ~( `: R1 ] Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 {2 Z! Z8 k4 _3 D+ cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* x o% _% k8 qlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
! S. x$ _. a: ~' @' Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,9 [3 T) t9 c5 b4 D+ s. V; W$ j" C
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ _+ B2 N4 T) W/ opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before8 v, w/ H; T. |: b& ~" d: j
making a purchase.% V" N5 _' P" y
4 \7 T7 }* p. x$ ?3 X1 \ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing/ Z0 U; G6 S0 n: ~4 Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* `: x# i1 I0 t+ w* a$ D9 Uconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
7 H1 [* y- N+ ]( E" v _6 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting+ [1 }. X$ Q8 p% R
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- m, w" _" K! N9 H U! o
amenities.% V) ~" u6 \" C8 O; \% E
3 K: s/ Q/ \1 ?2 G; ]5 h
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 w4 @. a- D+ a/ M' c5 h! M) B$ L
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ \' F1 L5 f) u( Q
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ E. g: w' [- }3 h: scontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( F/ ^! F6 @5 t2 I/ e" Z" Q9 r
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle* o( y5 K# i' T: ~2 u; V0 }
residence, rather than for investment.5 `3 x9 \/ c [+ E. S7 ^
% r. g3 d4 N3 e7 O7 g& Z% ? The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
) M7 o* s/ k* x; C: q/ m2 _8 Ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted! O# C$ R3 m3 [5 w3 M
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* N1 b/ G7 c2 Y9 C" N3 ]confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
& u" U" P0 F* V" I3 D; P4 U& erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
1 j' x0 V' m3 c- e- @the market.
; r3 o9 c+ U6 s. T3 ^( U( v2 T9 F* |
1 B& R+ J/ U. K! I1 m, p8 v. X% ` In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, ]8 e. G- r! K" h
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 H# _" L! K- qAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) d M# ?' A& O ]% v* Omonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- a6 F5 F$ I |9 r" mto the shortage of available inventory.! p c& I. V. X9 L
! v6 ~) P/ y' H( [! y; ?) k. _4 c- y
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 ~- b+ V8 x: m
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains9 L! S9 ] E( P0 v/ c
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
1 ~2 [& S3 o) Q- A: x8 J. Sstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% |+ i! f4 H! @& P
4 b, Y! B4 s: @/ o) { s Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases2 h5 O( P4 B( J: H* E
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 S4 X4 }5 j9 w- H" l ^unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
$ s2 F' N1 \+ [" B3 y2 \pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 f l+ B+ O- X, E
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer! N& R% X4 [9 Q" ?8 _
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 i9 l9 H9 |6 d6 A5 G; Abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.( s7 V& N+ U8 B8 p
6 g! m' ~" N5 n& B/ |+ Q* @ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter9 o/ l! f: P+ g& g5 N$ {
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
9 q( S8 U+ f" q7 F3 |5 N. C/ D5 V2 zremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* H4 ^) G* m( X7 d' j: b
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) K* y' m5 O5 B8 u; Y2 M
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
( E% J) e6 L# }1 `8 E7 M! Tin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly* ]; A' z# N4 ?& `) W- H( Z
towards the end of 2006. 8 G3 v4 ]6 ], z4 Z- ?' e V
) a( f. k9 N- }- l+ p7 n3 f" qWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% {$ E n5 I! W* H) l+ \3 |
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 L V, f, A# j7 ?6 @to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
4 I0 x& z* i5 U. J& B4 }3 a( pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
/ R6 r s. c1 tforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
2 ~; N% I6 q/ `) x' y" w6 u, U1 \# Bpressure on tight inventory levels.6 \7 m5 n# y8 W
/ {" \/ O2 u# ?# X, d* U Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ }& T( i4 y @& P5 m5 L$ t2 [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" S* R2 e. a* C w8 a; @into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. g( q* d+ X7 ]2 @( u7 p) x
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching q& [ M1 l5 R" p
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ Z% d9 V" k# e0 O' |. z8 A4 W6 V+ c
$ j7 d6 y- n2 O( r1 ? b6 r' }8 G <<9 G* @( W. |' v+ t/ L
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. J+ x& R! b! X% I$ ^9 U6 L
$ n4 z6 g! h, c+ d9 l* a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 x9 d$ m4 l" _5 Y: H+ a5 @' j Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
3 X) }* ^* M9 E2 E" u1 _& v) Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; @" `, U' q7 y7 E' X6 i 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3+ L/ ^5 H! w( r2 h8 p9 O
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ ?, O6 h$ e* w7 L9 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ?* ]- v$ V7 N4 N3 q) p
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000 o, P: n. v1 p5 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! P9 p. ~; C8 H: t' b Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
$ `$ Z8 D1 t( N3 w- Y/ z -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 J" M5 m# V: {; _7 n
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0009 J( g" f: }$ C# n1 _, u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) k2 w$ z$ w* H4 g F. Y9 d Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. F. S1 a: q/ k: j. G- G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' Y" q1 C7 u) F6 N, o2 R
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
+ k+ l% U' ]0 m" w& Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------. L6 m* Q G# c3 H; ^* v' Q% K( G
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 U. j& N, U1 ?4 N9 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 S" |/ D5 q# h0 E2 _ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185$ W+ D- D( L0 X3 @) E; y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ W9 R) j0 O7 B3 e6 ]5 Q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250+ K( h9 `/ t; N; c7 z! C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 _0 E% H; S5 Z+ s! @ o# n: K! B/ H
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7664 \7 F `4 X1 P2 E- S. P+ c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* P& X7 i* b1 O# ]% @* ? T! ^6 j
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707, a- q) ~8 T$ c3 D" ?" n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ G( y9 C6 P' P7 a5 {+ W) ]
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500% h9 q& r( x' I# ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 f c0 }3 \0 [2 e4 P Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
! T2 B( W5 ?0 n7 K ------------------------------------------------------------------------- l/ I9 F6 G3 n( h" ]
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
' p7 y' G( C9 @6 R; U# G, O -------------------------------------------------------------------------- u5 _9 N2 }. _4 W& F( g
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
2 u U7 R2 i2 I [/ K; K9 N+ N- Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y- i: u% w8 A) {6 e+ g% }5 { Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
' o$ q9 j! N* f9 @/ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------, G- v' [7 p" v- b+ ~8 a, L( h
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
% s2 o# P+ B. N; X% w4 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 E9 `$ s$ Z/ R/ F9 z
: x1 Z$ k' m+ u5 _" u* _( I7 e5 E -------------------------------------------------------------$ D) i" b5 {( B) O
Standard Condominium
# }- s/ l6 u, [+ G -------------------------------------------------------------" u! v% h' v3 G5 y8 |
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
. s- g# v/ q& c" s; F8 o0 E$ ~ Market % Change Average Average % Change
" h' Y9 g) \- V( R/ _5 Q9 V5 { -------------------------------------------------------------- {( }4 M* e( S0 T6 c2 P: q
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%7 p8 u' P+ h5 D, A$ `6 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------' m& ]! z- L& _. k$ }5 T. M
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
+ f7 e* a, V( x+ w+ H1 |9 _1 a -------------------------------------------------------------. o( G* Y3 S" Q4 K
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
" l4 _% D5 }5 ~; f -------------------------------------------------------------) c' U" d4 O: i, k, z
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ y0 ?& k+ m- N& H& O
-------------------------------------------------------------
. b* U6 z Q) w5 p St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%) w& r* I$ t" F0 ]8 p
-------------------------------------------------------------* C9 h3 g! C3 t8 Z f
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
) `! }; v" i* r9 ` -------------------------------------------------------------
) B0 @* w2 y% |& ?* M: F+ S Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. b# f+ ]7 t) B( i
-------------------------------------------------------------, Y& {2 K' S4 v5 o# |' P2 J6 a( ]
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%! w" j$ Z; T+ C0 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
* l0 j+ e; i' X7 M; Z; I Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%# N2 u9 z9 x8 \7 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------7 w( R7 W4 \4 D' _
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%7 i) g- `. s. o+ I0 ]) N/ t
-------------------------------------------------------------
( p: n, d( k6 k! y Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
5 [6 B. K+ {& y- `6 ^7 |% p ? -------------------------------------------------------------
2 K9 i8 u- _" Z' P% Y) t2 g" j Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
, E: P. i) K, B6 q -------------------------------------------------------------( A" D4 b. S# Q- L# I# h4 Z9 A- ]8 e4 U
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
% b# x$ k% S& X9 N7 u: i, j -------------------------------------------------------------/ a1 u9 X) T0 j9 A* e2 R% ^. i8 `% v
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%# B% k- X9 i4 q: y; t' i/ q! B( D0 T
-------------------------------------------------------------
! b5 ]! @8 w# L7 r! g Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%6 y6 J& H) F/ L C
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 i' U0 X/ c1 h) I! |; j% F5 V8 d National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%+ D2 a; u* P2 Y$ k
-------------------------------------------------------------
! W. V% g% x* @& Y' X% V' D& g >>4 `9 h7 z- m# Y) k" [
- f3 F) H! \! A/ Q
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 R8 o1 f6 o" [6 X/ R8 T$ Lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ [: X+ S3 j2 w H1 `
John and Victoria.
) e. g: Y" C3 H9 ?4 N. g7 w
7 b, k. i: K3 L4 h7 M6 K9 P The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, a& F) }8 ]! M) ~6 L* P2 n5 U N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of# |$ s) j% U3 h( U. ?, P$ w; H
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
. A6 c- ~1 k* R: p; ^: Qreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price' E# O4 ^; M$ \ w8 Y8 I1 l7 F
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' k: \9 g4 V: Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
( f) ]6 j g6 `1 @0 L% Qavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. U# J0 ~7 X. i
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 [( L( U* f3 \% ]+ F+ D2 ` l
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' F+ f; d: E2 ^November 15, 2006.
$ i: |/ C1 A4 ~6 m! M Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
1 h! w3 D3 j7 j% P2 ]fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge% E0 A' u* E7 ? b2 X
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% y( z& a6 s: l% f( A: K3 ~2 C
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|