 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : @ B+ d( L, [
7 M+ _# X& ]' |8 H- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -! g9 j0 H( \, l6 p
7 H/ i- T5 K$ F* b( k
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 V* W, M1 t* x. ~# f) l: cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
K1 L8 V( U- G' `! fquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ X0 y2 M6 s- z3 I% ^
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit f2 G' v% z9 w: _5 K
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ n: T2 S1 d- G+ @. ~& vmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- W; b$ P( Z+ Y( b
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal T! Z# d7 r, p) j
LePage Real Estate Services.
+ N7 |) c: S( B6 `) a( [* [* n' h7 i% p$ ~7 s* @( u
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
2 ^" V! |! a! pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 n# d# M2 A3 ?
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 y; [% }' f' @1 I. y4 Esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
: u9 E- B1 a4 j I; {2 \ i \' oresidential real estate sector.: M4 R8 ~* K8 I
8 }' X1 ]% ^" X% p G
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( q# P0 h2 K* B) i8 boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# z# T2 L; W0 w( Myear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 e$ k4 w9 Q1 U& E8 r2 E5 v# K. G
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 n7 c. p- J4 ?1 k" {' h(+13.2%).
' Z6 f% y8 a6 G! f/ E5 i& w
& C8 V: Y1 Q3 w' G& n0 @* V "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth! H5 ` D- _+ H {* G6 `5 _
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: O6 }! I, v) I v% \& mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
% S& p6 B: V2 S4 o; p7 Ppoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
" h3 c) @' k: ^( p6 y) ypresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
/ l9 s& ~+ Z! ~2 m# W, l/ X" Q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( D- x( g& ^. r3 twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ V5 ~% q$ B5 M- i" Z' ^- ~3 C+ b7 Mbalanced market."( v; w. f1 h8 Y) _+ h
& W$ d+ O! o ~3 H/ } Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ j( m! x) W) M% t& C
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
u8 G8 R# J& f: V6 |to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( z* D# C4 U9 O/ K: T& _throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
; v7 H- {; B; renergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 Z2 _+ Q+ ~$ k+ u
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
, a) m( v3 O$ \) d3 T# @breaking price appreciations.( {& b' g9 U+ j
& M! z& l% G+ _, w
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
" n+ q7 O, b3 a+ F# s; D ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 k. n- K8 v9 O. b8 Slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
9 u6 F, e6 u8 }0 I8 }4 |. |- q. g9 p% m0 L7 v0 j7 n+ c& _* |: S7 X: M
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 z5 t' h2 E7 D( p' Q, W* r8 D' [) heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
' I+ t" `3 W" t4 {% [! f% y) k0 { Y5 gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" Y7 L6 o* @" H$ {, K Y ?5 G8 oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 T/ c4 A T1 L4 k/ t2 L
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers% A7 {9 h+ L" q8 N# k( S4 e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of3 r3 w3 G' w( m( p: E1 U
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
( L4 S# q+ N2 i- o7 u9 \" H6 |
' k8 f; E* b& G3 A6 N While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
! x- E! F3 \6 D' j: ~market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% P" q; ^- J8 V
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ H8 e6 N; e* |; @( X: eare markedly different than those found in the United States.2 j' j" k. ?6 ^1 m+ f* |# O9 V, F
. J+ | {7 E: M2 s4 i+ B" K Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
/ r) b- m) ]: |- L; f dAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's) l1 x0 P" w7 r$ K4 z
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the, Z( W% [; [7 K+ u. l# T
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' ^% C" h8 {+ w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
$ f' t+ ~5 C8 S" P: q7 ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 F% [9 J: H+ c! Raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 Q3 v; \% n; |& F4 e8 imortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
0 f2 M% @; Z+ I! q4 C+ D6 K$ C
1 {1 Y' A; E _ <<
$ ]( E2 Q) a, M; t0 J K# N REGIONAL SUMMARIES
0 U9 S; w8 Z8 d- k5 |3 Z >>1 y5 o3 W/ k$ }" ?# B2 u
# c* Q+ T- i7 L6 v% U- U- y: A' T: E
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ U6 H& [1 P! x- q t
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' @& e7 @2 _% C$ t- S6 o( c
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! o7 k9 `8 t& z" ?6 u3 A. X. v
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ z* Y5 S" S' @% [( {9 U
renovations.
- I. P$ z$ |4 h
0 N; S2 Q0 s- f; t m g* y+ X The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight+ G- P4 B; J G* |; P+ ?( c- l8 t
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation3 O8 m+ ^% L9 ?+ r# `# {
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and: z9 s+ v5 F0 n6 {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.+ i% \ d( {. p" ^' E9 k' v1 B
5 d7 c4 @6 ^; w2 L4 w+ t% i) N& E The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. ?3 d$ p! t) u' s
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 F/ n& M7 N$ G+ v. Q
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) [! W3 j' M! _/ R! [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
- {/ h5 k3 x9 ~- K: X' z& Y* sto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 Y0 \. q+ s& O! V$ s9 Y0 uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 p5 l4 q* t7 Q2 X8 x
7 o+ @+ O9 d' L( }) E8 Z' }/ g
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced0 J4 t& n; E- x, Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# i i3 l; W1 h% Q# k) x+ uhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
b# `# j7 G9 {3 Nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian" ^" `7 ~) c1 M. h1 K
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
v6 H. }& L+ b4 a3 _: Kbuyers with more options when looking for a home.: }. C0 N$ U1 O. i$ f+ [; ]4 S( o
) f7 D9 v" v" q/ s! q, H
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 r+ G( m4 d9 ^2 i" w! c. s
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 R. d( ~9 F, V8 V1 d; H
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,4 J, t1 y" W9 w# K8 ~1 m
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% x: F0 }- i3 b, A5 n- I& r
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 S* {" |$ m! e& W' f
$ m- _. N) O# C- J9 c4 F
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ j i5 Q( P: ^, Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
) y9 P7 h Q' K) P' N- `' tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
6 V+ t( G- |- ?, J3 Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 s& j" F1 k1 p0 t
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
]; D, w4 b- }3 y2 @- apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 Q* K: T9 p- ~/ s9 gmaking a purchase.
1 h4 G, E. Z& x3 S. L9 m' [0 K* x
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% ?. ^% h( ]6 a# Amarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" h: \2 w$ F& Cconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city2 ~; k8 j3 U! W( C4 p3 W! b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting# ?/ l0 B3 P& ~, X2 ~. o' @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
/ U$ \* p( ^: C! i4 W0 ]; i2 l) Kamenities.
/ ]% F/ B: A' m, F* T0 J# g' C4 r
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% y! h$ X- d9 i- |
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand1 p8 ^4 O$ h h9 U; @
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% Q3 l( W8 p: ?/ wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. E8 W1 g ^* _& k( z
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 t" }6 t" E" T0 K
residence, rather than for investment.
; L1 `3 z& ?9 V% p" R) J
$ q! P/ k! Y# `: T1 z {& g The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
3 x- e- l" }- L8 W3 f' ?' Whouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
+ {9 ]# K7 S4 \9 N" U, jin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' ^7 Z0 ]$ H6 S, kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization' W9 \( i+ B5 I! k$ ~2 E* H
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter7 D" B6 [- Q$ P' F) p
the market.' w- q! m3 U% Z, X* Y
- r/ J1 o- d9 h) `: q/ u, t( `
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ U" t' q$ }- U' p
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 j; `8 Q& S5 g- rAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 P0 ?' n2 O j3 I" smonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- N _7 O1 r) Rto the shortage of available inventory.6 m$ K- f/ a# b# {( x1 }+ H. `
; `( J3 A; l% i' g4 l Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its. f& V# s9 c2 j# b8 a1 T. d
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains, _# _9 L* J4 b$ @
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* Z% D& s/ W% d# B% t
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 i: }; a# C. t" Y* X
# A; A! ?: p) u! F7 [) ^1 |: ?$ [1 o& O
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
! e, w- u/ a/ o$ |+ Sin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
$ T( r2 ^: M1 m& D; g3 z. ?unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
3 x+ v0 d( o$ ^0 ^' |pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, f% O; S- f" }4 }2 b8 Kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
, k+ u1 g" t+ G6 kseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 Q# a6 h& Q6 ?# Y, R& Sbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.% {& t; o$ B" v0 }1 i
/ K, I8 J: J z" j( { Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter ?# }! e- T" N) D
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton0 E0 U* r9 Z1 |1 e9 p7 }
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
* L' M1 \4 X3 F4 }/ @- L2 nmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 {4 P, y) S" w5 {$ f: | m; aincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 q0 h& N0 B( h( D+ iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
% \; h8 e: h+ I) Y5 ?+ l0 Ytowards the end of 2006.
7 D& J# _7 u* o" T, t) Z/ n8 R4 g/ y8 _
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
0 |+ ]* C6 F- E ?6 R- U) kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 d# p7 B; W3 ] h
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 N: {) P7 _, m4 q( r% ~" R+ dgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. s+ e$ G, A! O/ z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
* y* ]* C5 @5 _" fpressure on tight inventory levels., k8 D) F3 D7 a" X% R
. K0 B8 G N5 G, c k# U, ^$ Y Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 m0 R$ f; l9 |4 r% qfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ P0 F3 h$ @& \1 s* \
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! M! T8 g' W; l& K( @) Q" y8 W& mwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 G' c7 J0 Z: W2 kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.1 ?/ G# v) }8 V( A
- v) |, z, q. g3 d( I& Q
<<) T$ z; Y( s2 C) E
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ |; W% F: Y# _1 c* a- ?1 [( ]
2 t7 c) F2 e$ e% U4 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: u% }8 O4 p3 x0 [2 t( @- O1 h Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey' V* {2 ^% t& a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; q8 }1 W/ R/ m. `+ z6 q2 i* e# m
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
8 x# {' A7 h9 p Market Average Average % Change Average Average
6 {# d% \# g; O: L, J# n% B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( g! f9 R" x2 _( i Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
) g- L* \3 m% x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 L5 {, d: O% w Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000! k Q; s( k$ @' g' ~* X, m' M5 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 [5 _ ?$ B& ]0 z' Z0 }% Y Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
- ]( F- A8 i8 n3 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------: O2 m8 P0 t; ?) p$ J
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
% q& ^% X; t8 j8 x: v' Z4 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! H0 T. [# ?& q9 l% a# ~ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3330 y, a i E. I/ Z2 G4 A/ N# J; C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( V* P+ S2 w0 ~1 L) w! @
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583: m* b8 D1 V, n) y: K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, `, y, ^7 z |5 |/ p9 }0 `
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185- d9 G6 L2 B/ x4 c- H. V2 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ A1 x" H- `0 k, D c( j
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
# `. p' k) ~9 u. L( G. w9 |' E! L3 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z m/ I% O, ?2 i* T& i1 G F Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 o$ N$ y, j. `: ^" B9 j1 T7 w. I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ |5 ?" [3 }% N: l Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
2 O5 W# a# x& P+ O6 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# u% f' C2 L2 y6 V& ]# x Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500/ z- e& k, H7 z+ O2 g" M$ ]: T7 f9 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* l9 P+ c0 f, e+ A/ K
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3893 o8 Y4 D% ~+ T5 N1 o: N- R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; w5 s0 \7 X. r6 s
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
+ z, Q) N& c( h& i+ S" [% `5 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* k3 F* W1 \* l7 J
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5004 _- l- U }7 ^! v$ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ m2 r% `1 e+ y7 m* F5 w+ g
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 P( E3 ^/ G2 ^( w" ^4 ^- k1 g& W$ \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ P! W$ {, s# r0 ~3 B
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860; `' N5 x! ^8 R) c2 U8 X( B+ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 D8 b: ^+ D( F! H' Y$ f1 x, j
$ t# O( R6 E/ D- R) L7 Y* d
-------------------------------------------------------------% \( O2 t# @" K" H7 Q% }* S
Standard Condominium, u. N% U7 g7 v
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 M, K9 F, I* a 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
. j* n* |! v4 x8 @7 _$ L$ R/ g% _# y! r x Market % Change Average Average % Change# P% T1 u( W% E
-------------------------------------------------------------/ y1 |& E) a% c; Y
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. J) N8 u$ R% d+ n; a, b -------------------------------------------------------------
4 l, }+ d3 l0 l1 Z" j/ i Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: h- ]6 F; ], O' w( Y
-------------------------------------------------------------$ j% j# m, Q7 O' p( b- d
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A6 @# P! S* {) V! N% [. G
-------------------------------------------------------------
- r! k: w+ b# t/ a9 f; E9 c Saint John N/A - - N/A
. Y6 K& q) F5 y4 O$ C -------------------------------------------------------------# q/ l$ e9 ~; P+ D, ~
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
" V8 P7 q1 t' G6 K- n -------------------------------------------------------------! P! D' K1 W, W& x: O G6 @
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
8 X4 _9 o7 b0 s+ W' | -------------------------------------------------------------
, A& I2 [4 n3 c( h/ }+ T Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%4 S; [: C& M" i' @: G4 _
-------------------------------------------------------------2 m$ L2 v3 M& C. L5 Z5 h
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
/ N8 P# Q9 K& T% q3 o! z! G7 z -------------------------------------------------------------5 d' f9 e$ E5 d+ b+ } h
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%: O5 }4 Q: H i
-------------------------------------------------------------& R8 V" O+ ` N9 _" v! ]6 N, }" O
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
9 { N l3 v5 _5 Z1 G5 Y; _7 h -------------------------------------------------------------
" g* ?; K3 H4 z; _: b& E Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
) W, m: d& H- {2 @" o, g9 G -------------------------------------------------------------8 \2 P ]4 ~. o+ |8 b: J7 `
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
9 L0 m; G7 b* u3 N -------------------------------------------------------------
; P7 Q/ k0 ?) h4 a; r Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%3 s. _3 w4 P ~- e- R$ }
-------------------------------------------------------------
* ` p9 h3 j6 E$ b7 A Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
3 e: i. \( ?) a5 }9 I# K' c; V -------------------------------------------------------------$ D' k$ P8 i* B7 T
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
% D! b3 Q x/ c& G) Q+ X2 A; ? -------------------------------------------------------------
2 e6 h( H) ~! `: a4 f- j! l! d National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
; I! \( L. _ Q -------------------------------------------------------------1 {; O: W' T9 ]0 Y
>>
4 j2 O1 U1 J+ ?% H% v
, @+ n& F# D9 V p3 x& y$ Z0 m; o6 Z3 f Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
M3 N: Y B8 c& e. A Xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 H0 M9 q: g4 ~0 PJohn and Victoria.
9 A$ C2 e& L+ b) e
3 j+ a A: }: s- C. q The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
h8 C6 V$ J% b9 Y, [) w6 }comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
$ V% m8 [2 `7 _+ R( \$ B% Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% N' F O& f8 G1 V2 M
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) j% l! c, z* I1 y6 ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
" ]/ {) p( b4 G) qacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 I2 z+ i9 }; `, V4 M* r. Kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current, P9 b( n) k+ _ F
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 b% B# e* k& U/ \: y
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 f; r7 A( H. C INovember 15, 2006.7 k- a& @. v f8 C0 c+ m/ y
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of' @# M. o8 S* o; n+ O$ ~1 ^8 `
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, Q& u: R$ V/ E9 s
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# }- ?* b4 `0 m! q. Mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|