埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2043|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
& E: q+ ?0 G8 \2 r* n6 [1 ]4 S2 E; [6 N& R# b2 o
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
' u6 F! D5 T  q- \  D; x. j( m! [# E) k  q# j
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ h- T4 R' @9 Q) S) {
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
3 P& I1 \9 Y1 c* H4 xquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 J2 A* H% I* t1 {in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit9 _9 f  B7 G3 A2 `. ?
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. l/ ?* `. p# {0 g# Kmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 l9 _, h2 _* Y: S! v
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
, z5 `. R0 [9 E$ J( i# @8 O! t  SLePage Real Estate Services.
! ]1 j* C- b1 j( z: H$ h! K- v) x, O1 |
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
% U2 y  s9 z. Z2 e" p. \are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 u2 k# L) \6 `, m& b/ u% j+ {
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ E- N4 ]  ?% p5 U: H( u
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the" m& H- Q* t# w
residential real estate sector.8 ?9 K* B6 H7 @. d- n/ f' Z  ]2 m

) k! F0 S9 O6 F4 G& u    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
9 R* B4 R. K4 doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- M0 R. S" W- G9 K, X. S0 E( [year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
) z& e5 R$ u- U) s# C(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" P6 h, y8 X0 J& e% I+ i6 O; j9 Q/ `
(+13.2%).. C$ ~0 z: g. q5 b6 ?0 L

# |" Y  H# p+ ]8 }6 K/ ]) Q    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth7 v; F- @9 `7 [9 Q
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ X, ^  R% R) N4 b# T/ f. l8 e
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
0 K* `6 k( G# v- q( Fpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 _! m. a9 `2 d3 gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* f, @: A3 L9 k) k2 _7 [9 r! a& S"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 A: \  U6 p8 T/ Q
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
7 \6 }8 _2 v/ zbalanced market."/ ~$ N3 g/ j& l$ `

. r! l3 K5 e3 [    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) @% t7 v7 f( k8 @3 w1 g: `considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
1 s4 j/ n! P2 K& ]4 rto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% R! X8 ?: Y" @7 S: J& r, Lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core  y. e9 t# c1 P
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,8 U  |" U( w, |
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ J, N1 Z9 D6 q5 ^* mbreaking price appreciations.3 G0 ]0 S8 N0 Q, b& t7 K# v
$ n7 _3 A" Q2 g% y6 b* V
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
$ h9 ?3 H+ y$ [4 Q' a, q4 j1 s& Peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* e3 p: m: e5 q0 G+ }largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.1 b- v! \( T0 }2 a* B: [
; D6 `4 ~  W1 ^5 j! g$ o5 P
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid& I: G$ b; K5 ~+ L2 w, j3 b
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
5 i& Q3 A6 F9 H- d- {$ Iconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 Y  N: m' o% N' Q5 s. q
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.$ D  K. ?, L7 i: V
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" X6 Q. c7 P8 V7 |7 e5 _9 n
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! x: ^  Q1 |  r( u; ~9 M
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
' A4 Y$ X+ r# y$ m0 P* |3 u$ K* }# [; t# ~; U! w& w+ F
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; M* r6 j  b. n2 \+ O% l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
7 x# l* u2 D9 \* X" y# L+ [5 Vfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada; P" a, U/ j$ t
are markedly different than those found in the United States.1 t) w. G% Y' G3 d: K/ p$ Q5 |4 n  ]

0 ~: \. C# F4 p1 t, B" R3 I    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 H  b$ {2 v: z% TAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& ^- ]; l& J, M! Y3 C0 \
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* Z6 B3 f& {5 U4 G# q( frelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
* n& b; `. S3 U/ X# l6 iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) X9 c0 }. c4 E" s5 V/ z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( D( u2 f0 d$ Z, q* v4 g
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization% F: c2 S( u1 [3 z
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# L9 u3 N$ m" W: h: I

# k2 f$ a5 _% J0 E. W. [; z6 ?( T    <<
. T2 _  d; R; f                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) _6 b0 ^, e, v  l; ]    >>
0 e" L  ~( n/ U# c5 X& O, ]
0 ~: ~% q2 m2 p    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in. a' v: w1 x. L  z3 A
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate5 W4 E: \3 d: r( l& a
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
" M1 h; o  z# m0 q. M6 V2 E- W/ O8 {looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
2 [1 Q8 {8 Z' V$ P7 v% t( Wrenovations.8 [7 w4 _+ x! q4 n

; |) f& G' g9 I1 Y: i9 o' T. z1 w. ^    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" ^4 D# k' R6 @% K2 J" b0 t+ {; W
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
( r: J; ^5 b( _# Ucompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 d9 I, B6 t; m# Q- vSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" S6 ~5 i: Z9 J' r% u+ s
4 O. _% ?; G3 k) i( Z) J, y    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" v; o5 X2 P/ \6 H1 a* ^slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the1 E! L: a/ o* \3 q4 j) ]
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ Q* j) B) d+ R  m+ k+ k
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) P$ j' \( W& u% w# E0 V
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
: u. i) B' j( u6 @" Sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ \. ~! k) z$ y9 }
7 }9 L7 `) v1 h  L: C& M    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
/ b1 o7 i* F1 ~5 c: O6 Oconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their% N. v+ B& @, d" D
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. E8 Q; S6 C) q$ {8 E, u
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian* l' l- o4 B8 Y0 Q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 R  P& [* ?8 v1 Pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 P0 N* k# q8 \( r2 X  v0 x+ V
, V9 ^8 M5 V9 \    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 S8 w! y$ m3 e- p+ j
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ [5 y; f5 i3 X% L! j
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," x; M# Q8 i: B! e! \' z
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
; t/ Z$ G& {$ y- Afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
& g0 B3 Y: X8 v/ n: V( F
/ Z7 z0 X/ O" H* `, s    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 K. W7 [9 ?- hprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory, D6 K( n! h3 D; C
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 q& g* E8 B: I) hfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ _9 X# ^8 B$ \; g9 Cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% D2 h" N+ W$ D" [" d" Fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 f+ ^+ `/ g9 J
making a purchase.
+ V* Z+ D; d8 G8 s% w" U3 x/ N8 Y' j4 B
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
( k# ?4 b: u4 [/ y: D/ `8 ^markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
$ f( K* b6 D. Y9 g% mconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city6 x. y. T& e  \% {/ ~$ i
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ \0 q- |. K0 v& c9 r7 r" B  dattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
( s; `# b% \5 D6 B# J+ {amenities.
' `4 g) _& }- |2 V: j: ?  o  J1 v2 c  P
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- ?: K$ ]! @4 L$ M% p) Y6 Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 W2 F! u7 [# a5 K9 U2 x- F
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: W" o8 E/ F' {
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
0 e6 c3 |! E) sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* q. _4 |6 _1 S# @residence, rather than for investment.% F! l& W+ F4 w  S% j
) `3 J$ o, [( r7 N; P/ B/ b6 j( g
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
0 a" [4 w  C3 W- w9 B: P( r+ |- ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 a) A& [/ _( Y1 o' h/ Q# g" M5 Y  K
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
# o6 s1 t/ t0 ^! ^; H: \, u6 P/ U3 Yconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization; k0 g! _, l- W: O
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: ~( y% ^9 a9 `6 W: `the market.
: a1 \2 ~: t6 [: L1 s' H: Y
- T" G' g) D, p% S4 C' X    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through( i$ I: O  h5 W1 I  f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 o: f: {$ E. o3 Y* _* [August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring# l2 W; k+ u- e! j  p$ x4 b" j% B
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( R' e! M: ]( ]+ h% b# F5 ~to the shortage of available inventory.. L  A9 L$ b' f! ?) I+ o
- _" [" V6 f8 ^) H
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
/ R! }0 l7 ^$ Y- ]3 [. C3 p' mmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 s) }. W' W. u( H& {vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 @" ~* s( n, e
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. a! A* W; W  N* c; o
8 B) ]# W% [. z3 z! C! u3 b
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 w8 M* L- p& F; S( A4 f) _in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
% b3 b$ l2 U: ^- R* Funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ V; t. C: r7 r. Tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
3 |  e9 q7 A8 W# y8 P, A3 Lprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ N8 _2 F+ ]9 |9 m3 _" t: Cseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as# U3 y9 G; ~) m. t  |. G4 N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

- F; u2 x0 x2 l
1 |1 N/ w: X2 }- c6 G    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
# U5 E' u3 V) X* Y6 Y" P* ^  las activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 X) w# ?  K: B7 g8 t- z4 e
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- ~$ R% N: N! f1 v5 j2 D4 smaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! E& I0 Y- x8 K* @increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. i* j7 Z6 c: @" v- L; Zin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ _' i5 x" u' z. M: ntowards the end of 2006.
    " o5 t' {, \4 T' R; T3 t

# X+ [5 P& w( k# y- _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ D1 P; O; d/ I7 w; d4 I* G$ p) p0 d
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% l/ P4 x, Z, S' e$ H6 F$ A# kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse5 x0 d  o. e$ \8 c5 w
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to! S6 R! Z) y" s+ K
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; D7 E9 W& `6 {. v6 O. d
pressure on tight inventory levels.3 X  T+ M! k" m2 L

- p! L# T0 K7 P+ c    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% C1 B: R+ e" i# K2 r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
2 w: u. H: s, I8 X6 d5 [into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, f# x: c- E6 B5 c0 {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 q3 F+ v( F) K. \6 |
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% _0 I( X, o3 }/ t

7 V4 M; ]" n* e* y    <<
0 x* K2 B) Y  a      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
  |9 I" O! j( X  _' I9 ]1 U/ i
% `) E5 L! g+ d- ~3 h8 m; H9 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' x0 C1 ?3 a( n+ f8 V! Q- c* b
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
3 b2 w# W0 y* Z( Y0 }% ~5 ^$ x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- y& h9 d0 y) E
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q38 s8 C$ V4 d7 _" }* i, e3 o
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
$ d* m4 W& y) L# G4 }! q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 d$ a1 l+ n" D2 ]/ V2 Q    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
  w9 R2 r+ P, s& B7 d* Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 S4 I0 v6 t  |& e3 l    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
8 s4 {, Z: _! a# R4 ~5 e* e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 I* w, L9 g% Y& n( N. J
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000( L0 N! o2 o, D3 R- V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ _. R; O* [6 C9 S0 v* D
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
. i) E2 @9 J, Q$ j) z1 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; s: W6 ~# J+ R! Y" P+ u+ |7 k    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333" W; u8 x' g1 c' }; K; f& Z# z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ `  H; b; G# V% s, |, E# g4 X, K    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5838 Z) E! \, y: g% y) W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  _: l/ t: f  i$ v
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1853 d# Y8 \6 x9 o' O4 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- l. A, _( m8 ?, a/ s1 _    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250( Z0 s+ Z! G! V3 f# a  r; @4 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' y; E6 x! d' i" o    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ p8 K4 k' B( ^+ K+ k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ a+ r# |0 A8 |6 h) M' Y$ ?& M/ z
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707$ T) A6 B2 }2 B9 A4 M. H) Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* o1 g7 [' O2 E7 ~& l2 o" N: l
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
6 t' }6 W' U% _0 j0 T3 p3 E9 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Y) ?. n; [! u    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
8 v; r' F6 }4 B0 j3 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; i# t$ \$ k' L9 G
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714( `, G/ _7 o! `9 i9 z$ c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, P& }  C1 p; m% `) g. A' d1 m2 ^
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500: e) l  G% j/ x8 k" C. R3 e7 ]( {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: {. y# E6 p7 M    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000) r$ V: W4 h1 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 [: N/ J2 |! f: N( M    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
: h0 N% y; A3 L6 |5 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Q( ~' i" {! a/ m! Z/ t6 I7 B9 A9 H  o1 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------. Z9 X$ R# Y* J8 o6 c
                               Standard Condominium
2 Z; q$ `# J+ [1 W; W    -------------------------------------------------------------! p: @" @' `* q0 H7 h# r
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo+ j* k2 v$ P$ B+ t5 ?
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
% P# Z. S$ I6 A, [6 [& e$ F3 z    -------------------------------------------------------------
" h+ G4 }3 ^% R& `2 d9 v+ F    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%& J+ U0 ?$ \# E. R# c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( K5 e  A. w* i8 a    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
% W/ W* A$ E/ }- u$ I. L    -------------------------------------------------------------1 m; D% `! J  P) e: H4 M6 |
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
9 J$ q! {6 a) u; m    -------------------------------------------------------------& m2 b# V5 N2 g6 I! ~
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A' N. K4 d9 \) S& N) V) k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 E. \: k, b2 R5 R+ |7 O, k, |/ O    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%% e. o% R9 c# o4 D0 d9 B' t& [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 R( `* B" `$ B% V4 o# {0 o    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" R; e" X' B* v" v& J% o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 m( R6 n5 B2 J, p    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
8 X" s8 R; x0 t% `    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ Y! Z, G* v- ]# a. K0 `    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%  `  M! s9 I9 N# t& r% K# s* z. y
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 n" S' J3 M2 V1 V/ b/ ?
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
, b& o3 A: O2 L2 U! g! T' k7 F7 K    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 y& p8 V4 i: w    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
/ D% _1 @) C4 r% X; O8 J- f    -------------------------------------------------------------3 X4 e  S% W' w2 a
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
. }. k6 f! N8 r3 g, F4 m    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?9 `5 c3 B1 q8 ^    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%8 G  l2 e! h2 T2 q. B: e+ q: s! E
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 Y$ i% t8 v1 ^) y7 G
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%3 p5 x2 Z+ d5 G& f) T, r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: w2 y+ M; [. p' f  c# r    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
" S2 {/ l  Z8 B$ G- s2 `    -------------------------------------------------------------8 r. n# r& `# ~/ ]
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%# t' |/ E$ o' h) K; F! E$ {
    -------------------------------------------------------------; w1 }# O9 x- X/ F9 ^. L* q
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%+ i2 O9 T( S/ N
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ y" q1 Z7 p- B8 B8 x
    >>
- A: p- b/ b6 O" S: S5 Z+ Q4 [8 q. i' X+ V
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# d! P7 [9 l2 h5 ], k' b( z; i! Uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint# V+ q8 G  n6 v. A* B  e* X+ x
John and Victoria./ j: V: F+ j+ N/ J

$ R+ D% b! E2 [. V8 ?# ^. Y3 t  E: H    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ [* @5 c  H+ Q& H8 X
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: _/ a% l" T1 ~2 o4 t5 q# \/ yhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
$ ]6 o  \1 @7 M* F4 l' g3 Greferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price: k& X3 s( g7 M: k( {
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) S* L% z4 W# E4 U- ~across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 q4 P& S3 J9 x6 d; favailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
  x& h; l  i7 d2 pfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable3 j9 r% c6 a" `
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: s$ ?# ^% O5 C2 E1 B
November 15, 2006.
: _6 J  E% ?& z% G) G  t8 h    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. b3 L$ P- N0 A5 `9 L% Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge$ n3 o2 i3 v: `" h  l& w& m7 [" ^" r
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 A' _$ m. K$ c8 X) }. Eavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-23 05:39 , Processed in 0.177891 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表