 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 g6 h5 |0 R+ r
# g/ w8 x/ j0 }! m9 e& f h2 g- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -: P# I# V! I0 R* ~. R3 J
4 E" x% `7 N& j5 C
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ e; b- e* w4 m7 [/ G
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third$ _* c, z. x, D1 Y$ l1 }# h5 Y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic; ]: X: b- d7 N+ y; m) T$ V( x" l
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 i# S o3 A$ w2 G9 Y6 u& H# q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
" j {. H1 `( T; F) J, imore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 b" D, U$ M6 MQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
* Z# r/ W0 s/ ]$ B4 tLePage Real Estate Services.3 c r) c4 R" S2 ?/ W( Y! [
: q) s0 F k4 |8 ?! Y$ I Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters0 w: m* w9 Q/ v) u
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
$ k; c" q* Q- K+ O2 N5 jconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) z) @1 n5 n! g4 h \sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
7 `( m3 h* i' _- Fresidential real estate sector.
" q @; D2 m0 M l9 e# ^+ |0 R H* k. V/ N
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% p4 E: B W6 Z. W& w: ?2 ]) l4 Y$ ?
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)$ u6 s8 p5 l* g5 |( L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ f- z4 u' }* X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3801 F0 B) X4 b) ]; c& s* W
(+13.2%).8 U3 K" U# s) r6 ^# J- E
: S! z5 Y8 T! F- O/ x5 p
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth% A: z2 y `3 K) \7 U1 S
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the6 G+ l* v: |1 ` u/ |
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 B0 |& D/ I: s+ e. V
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,1 N; I, w$ i1 B' N7 m8 ]3 _/ q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.1 v. ?. A/ C/ I( i, K5 G% s) G
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We w& o1 N0 P$ b, S. R$ [$ r% l. e
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ {1 u0 w- m, s6 Q" ^3 u' N( Fbalanced market."% O5 p- S1 D9 C) b1 E
+ B6 s" t; E0 }0 g, y6 w) k Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,9 {( ?8 K+ S6 P$ j- D2 {
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 r* c y2 ~ v8 v5 X
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 e5 l( b( [' Z6 ]7 u5 Othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
% u* }# |, C" J7 p8 I6 Yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,: C+ I9 i' e( l: x8 Y1 D; T
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 p* w- p! E5 m$ v+ u# L8 y
breaking price appreciations.1 u* x# X5 U, [1 x# G9 @
9 r3 y# J5 E e; G6 T7 ` Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" M" r9 G, A7 n" t* P, c
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* B6 }9 |4 s8 e& Q9 Elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
+ \5 q# F f0 H& k2 p; b8 M* l4 k+ ] Q' @
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid6 m: i( t( I% o7 |3 s- P
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; E6 T4 \, c% Kconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
: ?" b' |2 j& i1 U4 pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 q8 n) h) C& x5 p% N, WIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ ^+ s4 o: v6 F
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
9 N/ x( h: E f+ Kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
: m1 L; e- Q4 g" U% ^8 w* s: C( ?) `- u6 z4 A) i8 D0 B& Y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ ^/ Y# }0 Q$ @' ?# Qmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ S3 y; k6 a; Xfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 g/ P% t7 t; Y! b! p5 f
are markedly different than those found in the United States.2 _: b' f2 ]& w6 Y. T/ b B
( J& W1 k4 E0 C7 Q Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' m1 o% }/ L4 Z; O
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's, _0 b7 L2 R' v7 p' x
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
5 x( @' s5 W) {( w3 U0 yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 \ F, t6 t% m5 r/ e2 baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) Y) z+ |0 v# `5 s( _ odownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 r) A2 R N6 v$ U: f2 n3 P( g" N6 S3 Maggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* B& c2 S1 N0 q/ i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
3 u/ q# @7 U: }- y: a/ I- g( B0 k1 i
<<
( v' f+ G" ?& Y: z; u! m REGIONAL SUMMARIES
' j. n" f: E) c8 K! y8 m6 C0 x% b >>
* {; U/ b3 {/ N- D! Z2 V( o7 h5 P3 i/ ]# [2 x) ]$ z4 I
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' r0 ~5 G. G- X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
4 X4 f6 }2 c* E& Fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time$ J- w1 z# y7 M
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ J$ X# ~& B/ a8 ?renovations.
6 M- J! a* F# s( e, ~& G& x b3 S. k; N
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 @1 R( s/ g x8 J! i6 tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& ^" Q. c; b7 q6 Z) Ecompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 ~5 E# U+ [. ?, J1 PSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 y; u/ N* M X8 W2 c" K" U: \( s: H1 X
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% b5 c; A! F1 V( w
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* K) i: ?; F( ^5 n9 i' A# Q# P. Mquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
/ D* F0 ]( n/ h) e4 [# }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
# p- T5 F( V, C6 L4 L0 Yto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
) p4 m, _# j7 a E% Sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' i) L: N2 v; t- e# r# K9 M
" |6 M3 T$ a/ c; W* D9 W; e' e
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 j' {) R, z8 `" ]7 X* \3 B4 K, X
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their* Z. e! r9 K$ j& X; V
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers& R% f7 d$ C X. G8 S
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' w8 L/ ~% b8 b4 }; h2 ?+ K/ W& u
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 o3 B( g4 Z( d8 M* H% H0 n; [
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
' V. E; J2 ^2 P* z9 E$ V* D
" u6 |& I4 f% a4 A* k3 D Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 |+ @# f4 g8 O
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' { @3 D3 O- {2 t3 Q
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 m c# S8 }4 N4 S/ W# M; X( `as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
0 f. f. J* I' r3 q/ Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
4 y; P' V" z2 f( }7 \) \
( Y- E* O3 E/ h Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
9 s: q7 d5 W- s2 F. _* f# ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 B9 @0 \9 q9 c: Z% \' U: H/ qlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- U- D& c ^8 f* A- l- S K
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
- w' N# k" b& C4 Bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
! ]. W4 g8 N" s- h1 n5 d! p" ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 v8 {+ R! E2 s' l; f
making a purchase.
* H% S5 s4 ]7 O% K) R1 }: ~3 t) [+ I5 I* T
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ y6 d& {" w! J5 a) o
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 u8 n. J7 Z7 ^$ W: o4 I q
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& `( F0 l" Z3 z* h, V/ vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, \: }- [ J( d2 p. K% q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
& \6 f0 R) y m3 P- \; X% famenities.
/ ^) b( ~: F/ b0 x7 _) ]
3 A6 o! P1 S* i1 ` The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels- r; [, L# \: ~9 O+ Z# v6 P& M5 `
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 c9 U1 N( Z$ m) t1 A5 {across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 S- b2 [$ a6 _% f Vcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 [* ]" u3 y6 X4 ~- b
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; a4 x! s) E1 @: Y A5 q5 e& Y
residence, rather than for investment.3 K' V: X& Z- d8 |5 K# a
( `. a; ^( |( y+ S
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
, ~$ b' z0 L0 k0 Q, @# y* Vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted- }2 ]$ ^' G4 _0 ? d; M% h
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer/ _. J7 d) t: R7 W
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" |+ w" `4 ] g, _2 x
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
# V# y0 @8 k! T! Xthe market.3 f6 V7 B# K: Y, ~0 s* H
+ ?0 ?) y) ~, }$ X In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 g( @2 }1 z1 C$ O/ s0 ?3 EJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
- P) i3 y# z+ n3 w) X; F" l) N9 d1 I. tAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring+ H5 k% B6 ]8 e; ]
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
]8 v2 c: h, g2 e* b* fto the shortage of available inventory.
& m+ f9 O5 r' S% T/ `2 `' J' B* q' x& e9 b0 I
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) [& Z; @8 T: m$ N
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) j( z/ j9 Y: u: v
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses I7 O+ p" z3 k D3 z) f
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." y9 h w; U$ V6 u4 S
. u6 w# B5 y& ]2 s2 T8 \' E
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* y- D- e) d$ T' hin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
' N6 D% E! O2 J% Q5 u' ^unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
! m8 t1 C7 }: }8 F" Vpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
' f8 [; e! q' [( w [7 \( Fprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ Y9 j* H( A' |season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as; Z8 I y9 K# S' n( R# R8 n
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, g4 g) p- d2 b' D! C# u0 ]
" ], g4 M3 Q% P# F Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter) ]2 ]8 d% C; T( X/ k$ C6 B
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton: d( T; t/ E( d! S3 n
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 t+ r) n! y5 ?/ n7 ?8 g
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
% s! k1 Z/ K6 b4 a5 R3 c( Fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 ~5 ~( v5 N( N& A8 b$ b9 n+ M
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. a9 Z( d8 S9 {6 j9 r
towards the end of 2006.
' h; i: t. M4 S* d2 e. p. f8 L. E# J; C/ c& x
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 o1 ]* D1 n3 \inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 X+ O V* r& {# ]. s- Rto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse. W* H0 A' h6 q& X: w, {( t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to R( a/ U9 b+ ], X& m _
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, `- r8 V. {- F& t$ ?! M2 [pressure on tight inventory levels.
( z$ t3 P, \2 {5 E# s, [1 S: y c7 K. ~/ Z* ^" u1 k+ P; X
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ l% P7 e; T1 e3 g' w! @9 V s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) N; i, N- e- e3 |) ointo the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" W; \: x& p4 t' h8 ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ g! V2 C( M3 u0 rfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
" Z8 v, Z! `2 E) A) ^+ G2 i1 ~
<<+ K: o7 o6 x1 I/ A
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20063 p$ x, N$ r% W z1 r/ @
; ], F% K% Y3 F- F$ @" J/ n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- f2 j! R- \: C& \% t5 N. ]* _ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
' B: V# m& v; T( j0 _; ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ l. ^& P1 r5 s
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
4 T h5 M& l! C, O* B" Q7 m Market Average Average % Change Average Average* h# M! b- d% d! P7 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 o2 k M k4 L( O, r% x6 G9 {% M5 m
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0001 S: B. _6 N8 S; L2 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) F3 ~ c: s" |$ S4 d( T* Y8 m+ Z Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" g8 r1 S$ B6 j$ l4 ~, }) r# n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, c$ L, S# g& U$ W8 V
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( H* w! S* B5 d5 r! O4 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* h b) _" y! X Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
9 b1 t* x+ L2 Y/ ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& q3 ]9 V4 X6 I3 G: ]( ^- }$ Y6 H$ N, [ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
3 j) V( [3 b; B: t5 H" t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) s9 f! `8 o2 `7 `& _ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5830 {& \6 Y5 Y9 R; [4 R3 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 K2 U2 R& u; r( n/ A4 r: A4 K8 r. m5 B Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185* j( S4 } V f4 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 `: j/ ] a2 W. Q6 M/ T; E9 i
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( e8 ~' Z5 i, \% S6 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ^ f/ B% L8 ? Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766" N4 f' T$ o" c6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* c' | `) ?2 n$ K s; B4 C
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707+ V: F: S$ z5 m: l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# l/ b: x( b7 R3 T
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
' d. K1 G& x, w( l) f+ Z/ r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# I" Z6 |8 j% V) X8 m ~; ~ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3893 F) l( A, L, e f, S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 a; a0 @7 o6 ~8 u& x7 t Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7145 F: A, u G, G# O3 R+ q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. W1 [) a7 g/ `+ t Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5008 F" K; m! v8 k' K7 r/ S$ ]: A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q: [4 B: r2 f8 s* p i" @ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, R) \1 V; d1 h( F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 K: e* p! Y& q$ Q National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
# I$ [& ?$ l' ^. [( l8 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 A) `& I3 d( f; ~$ i( Z
6 o; I1 j: B, r7 D) e' h6 H6 @2 @
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 v" W& d; D, ?) O Standard Condominium* ?$ O# [! \" z Q1 b
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ \( ~0 Z: Z4 h# d+ }' W, [( o6 H' j 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo# e' T. [$ y' N8 n6 Q
Market % Change Average Average % Change- P& O/ k8 l+ L" R. I! |( ^1 n% H
-------------------------------------------------------------0 Z4 U/ w; n- a0 a; I2 N- T
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
V' B5 W3 F' T o8 H1 X% X -------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z1 w" O) ^5 j j Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%' ]& d. [, K8 @! w
-------------------------------------------------------------& F0 a4 g6 J7 [# e4 K& ~8 z
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
) m- e8 j. q& \5 u i. O& s8 m -------------------------------------------------------------
- h% f; l ^6 i0 c Saint John N/A - - N/A+ l/ G+ {$ |. N! n H
-------------------------------------------------------------5 V: R+ y6 i. w" Q# c
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%1 e1 Y3 s" b0 e' t3 e
-------------------------------------------------------------
" w6 v( _6 [ n Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
8 B! c+ Z1 P4 n0 r: H k$ Y! a. z -------------------------------------------------------------
/ ?- F4 k/ r2 h) p# q6 n Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
" R8 f- a9 @ _0 J# _+ B -------------------------------------------------------------
7 B+ m% M0 O- g0 C6 x5 S! g8 X1 y Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 s4 l" w$ h9 j2 k$ j! n( B -------------------------------------------------------------
1 y" S0 l$ O4 r4 q3 F7 u/ u3 M Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
) ~( b1 f) ?; f -------------------------------------------------------------& _3 M, k0 i6 q" B$ L$ _
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
. S# i7 s3 z$ y8 Z$ \! q% j -------------------------------------------------------------; H. g! P# s. r+ w
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
# [9 x/ C$ F+ t2 A- r -------------------------------------------------------------7 q- K' {( J& M
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%4 o2 n- W( y5 h% r
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 l$ Z7 n( r9 O3 f) S- x4 X9 r( v Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. y) K) n5 j7 T9 A4 w% }( u -------------------------------------------------------------
( ~+ n: a d- v- {) |8 ^ Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
: I1 t4 E2 ]- s7 W3 R. G -------------------------------------------------------------
6 n r6 x8 V' h3 @& N! J Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
( D* v8 Y( n3 Z" i) { -------------------------------------------------------------( q! f: V1 n1 D6 H6 u% m
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
, j ~/ f$ u# R( U -------------------------------------------------------------
, m; m# Z: n! P: A >>
: \) g5 [- U- W# N
& r3 o' y2 |& v Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
$ p, F5 r; a7 M. B( Ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
8 k, p8 ~ {0 J7 ]: HJohn and Victoria.1 ]! `0 P6 _6 b" I8 p, ^
! J k; o% c. |8 m. w4 u/ K
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
; X! D4 [9 l9 D1 ]0 s: Acomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- p+ H3 e! G$ ^1 M! C' y! dhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! e# m' J9 U$ c* S- Rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 O! }2 q+ T e1 ~: X8 V l
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: m; |" U' |8 j9 ]4 O) n
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) `7 G' X" H! l& _2 K0 D9 t
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current3 F, O* H+ ^* y& i7 S$ u' j% G
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable( O2 O6 K) H- G# U: v, q L7 U
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
" ?/ P5 f8 e/ r; K9 @: d( XNovember 15, 2006.
|# y' D, X$ @$ N' p( t Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# M2 h1 D' b4 M M6 ffair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 }" M4 _% n) N# m! u, U2 ^provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ j: [6 Z* C0 C% n6 v
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|