 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
1 v8 f, T3 `# T9 i* A* Y) c9 H
' j" q* L( [( f, o: B
1 f. C5 u8 {/ ^你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
1 Q3 e2 Q$ K% j- D3 HRalph Klein, ]3 f$ A3 K! p. S& r: P: \8 l
1 z- n! n; e# a7 T4 s
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
% r, k- ]" U# @0 v3 `/ w& n' @+ O: @
`# H# X: y. C; }1 i `所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。! }3 ?- i1 E% p6 k7 v. q" I
) ?" `8 `9 L% Y7 c. L2 d% S2 H; I2 L& n* `4 v, Q" z; w. o, d
8 S+ Z0 `( a6 U8 V ^/ e* r9 rhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades) |# M& I( k, x. @/ w
Historic Alberta budget balances:3 W, k4 Y# T: [/ l8 f) g
8 T4 i! Z |7 C H x" h
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus2 P) V* u1 T: z' P2 n% w
: R/ r# M! J, K! S: x; m' x' @( l8 y
1982-83: $796 million deficit
5 C8 [6 s6 S- Y; s( L7 ?% T+ I) [
: `( |% [4 v @8 b* R1983-84: $129 million surplus1 e# g2 f4 X( r+ _" G
7 u% ~* Q! a5 n. X x; B% j3 W) ~2 R1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus( N2 p# R' C3 ~- _+ ?
* X1 `7 S8 p* M
1985-86: $761 million deficit! a( F8 [! @- i( ]
& F6 Y" j0 U, ^+ J" Y; _1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit% K* _# D7 }1 M/ [. t. {- J
! o8 y5 c3 j" n k5 X
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
5 U$ R- h# F; k/ q
* B9 ~9 Z* M( O4 ]! B1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit2 e7 D& |, o R' n
* I# `8 B9 m7 B) V0 z
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
8 K: e* W" T& c9 L9 c5 l
2 K% X3 m3 p0 l# S1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
9 S$ Z5 R( H) L2 l" b1 F1 k1 u
) o/ s7 O5 U7 S7 M s: a T1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
+ G8 W6 L! c' i2 `; l9 f$ ^8 H7 G5 N& F3 V2 R# `5 o
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
& P4 d; I9 w7 l5 r
' P* P' K2 ]* c9 X1 T* r# u" s1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
# n5 Z8 c: i( L: p# G- c$ v0 P
" o& I+ \$ p7 }9 ~: |1994-95: $938 million surplus
+ `& Y( _0 ]2 T! B+ N2 }/ B. D& o1 u3 Q+ f
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus/ N7 x: u7 i% L H) c% E7 w% t
4 S* e3 o0 f4 x- F* b- Z* `0 V0 A- ]9 K1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus3 K$ m/ V1 Q( }' c }$ a2 i( B) r
5 s4 \9 F. m. v l1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus* |8 I5 o* y. N, g$ Q" o& x- I
( E8 x: E$ D/ Z" a9 [) |% u1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus3 Z, [: M' K: [, o8 K
9 R$ @$ ^) Y- r! i1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
2 ^$ I; s0 i7 A2 `. ?5 a. C t7 X; A% e4 Z& ~- n- Z, R1 b
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
4 t1 T, ^+ S( L% T1 x( o0 L/ }2 u1 u2 e
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
, ^# a5 ~7 h% X
. ]$ V8 ^+ @! g' U! @! Q2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus; j! u" q# A+ A* r+ q* T
9 |* x6 i/ C; k, y8 b; K2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
0 P+ F# L/ W. s$ y1 a
+ r) X! M" v/ G* X3 t9 Z2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
% d/ Z; W4 d0 A
: j9 X* P/ e- m- }1 f9 u2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
: O; M9 X3 s; u! w
; u" N; h2 v5 l: k2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
2 d/ b9 [4 C* Z9 l: I+ i
" _& k) x3 n) [- p1 K& U5 o" e2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
( `0 `, m/ f$ N M7 m+ b" T' l8 f$ t' v& | G4 U' _
2008-09: $852 million deficit5 K) d4 |2 A6 c: B# I9 S( l
+ _+ X$ @' {' D6 _- T
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit3 ], _1 i& ^$ V8 f
- [/ B% R: N! K! y
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
( I- j( K9 t: f/ ~
8 K; _7 ?; @7 L2 M2011-12: $23 million deficit) Z0 v, j7 Y& \! P; `
* z3 L& @6 E6 i+ [* p
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit( g- [$ g% ~' D) N) S
4 Y# `) I4 ]/ `. |3 T2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|