 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
7 A% B2 S+ b# Z( ~7 K6 h- M. l2 q) X' k$ V& r$ ^
, K, O. h, E5 z; X
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:( k6 K z3 a$ B% f6 g2 z* {
Ralph Klein. r( P7 F8 X+ K
9 A3 E! _4 w+ v4 Y; R8 b
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
( N* a- H# o0 w$ M
+ ]7 I% H7 q6 ^$ [2 |5 q所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
6 i7 | }0 ?% O; } n
( }3 J p; W, z1 C( k) E) h E$ M# @7 x! Z0 K- {
8 r. U( j2 s6 }- Whttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
0 `- e1 K: i% n4 X" G( H! ?Historic Alberta budget balances:
: P6 c( G' [7 o3 D9 x
4 `$ m( u3 Z- m0 t' X) L1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus, T' d' { f6 \
* X5 b2 A# u* n" w! R$ l1982-83: $796 million deficit
/ M; c* P: a) T& j, \, j, {4 U7 ^( j+ J7 A- p
1983-84: $129 million surplus2 x3 A, x6 J" |
- E) y' a. `" u v1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
# [' f: K& ]$ A% v V' t3 F! M ^* e/ \2 M$ a
1985-86: $761 million deficit3 w3 Q: k' @ \
, N5 {. @; d# Z0 Z2 e7 K1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit* i2 a2 l7 C* E) @ r
$ \8 V. Z* q2 _5 S' g' F
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit: S3 ?6 {- d( R$ b
, G4 R0 s7 e) ?1 x1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit+ x2 P+ j; j& @# t8 f
; _/ l$ ^/ s$ C, X; c1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
: o3 ]1 w* d! K! d4 w
8 f2 `! W) v# p" h1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
& Y# u: J% c( I% G8 f
2 h' q# w6 I3 R" v4 q0 m& _, l1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit: t" D( X1 B5 u% e, C! ~# }
v& z, L7 V, s2 j4 O6 i" b7 X1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
1 A( q+ i- n2 ?2 }
6 @5 K2 D' \# y4 n1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
% U! x" h) [- g$ E6 i: O* @ n9 U7 D) `: d; U' @
1994-95: $938 million surplus
5 X- Q0 b: w- y- \* h. U3 \; E' T: C% e) D. g8 v0 V' i a6 p; C6 r
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus1 l% Q) w; K6 { [( K
3 m, x9 o/ {) @ n' _1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
9 j8 G! `! Y: F8 Y1 G6 V+ w" l2 M0 u; s' x. ^/ d& Q
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus5 [" G* ^7 ^5 z0 O% l
" A) p" }* |4 z; s5 s9 X1 V- O1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus9 W S+ ?7 ?2 S* ?! {/ w# e
1 G( w6 Y- y/ E+ `) W; r1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
6 k: K* ~' a2 J6 ^- V4 \+ T6 M9 [& j1 n& t
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
0 ?5 b& }$ H) _1 W5 z
$ ^1 ]' D( f1 x' {. ?8 N7 q# w) }* }2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus$ |# m( ]( O/ e8 S8 _
! e. \; N1 D" }' I2 P7 x' T [0 C4 ?2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus1 M! W" M% {6 c! d2 E
/ y# K8 ]4 P6 L% @, ^# V1 ?: W2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus# H% ]) G n( B. D
1 b0 t$ U1 E. \* f9 t# @6 h- Y
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
, D4 k7 ] M( ]' F
, X& P9 Y& j1 _# v" w6 l6 ]2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus, ~% a9 A* G0 O: e
+ Q9 Q' i0 z& a9 o
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
1 v B# z2 d/ `# b0 {& I' V# G }! Z. U% a0 d' e; ~$ K: x9 O
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus/ L" s+ ?7 x7 v) E$ ]1 ~ F( l
. k( b5 `4 t F/ m2008-09: $852 million deficit
( _9 l1 }" B5 m" R6 I
1 v4 A; q4 a) q d) M+ H* r2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit7 h# M) m& {% `; D' k
9 z x9 c! g$ q Y9 D) V2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit' o: e3 w" z+ z
4 d: E5 ?! F4 H' Q
2011-12: $23 million deficit5 {* T5 C' P( j3 C3 M
+ ~. v: p. U0 Q& D4 |' r, y
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
( P1 T) x9 c G2 a- P% c& N; U( @! Z' @: V0 c) @6 v: Y& n
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|