 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 2 T8 `4 x$ ]3 |
2 s- L2 L1 I6 z- o5 q1 Q7 u" }2 o' V* v
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
% _6 u* R4 J$ T K* BRalph Klein) |1 a; ?4 r, H' f9 \
4 G* J3 n+ [$ Q9 h# q* Y0 b$ _ O1 L
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!% W4 `$ u5 b; K- B
3 Q- b2 h6 j- h" u! N$ B所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。5 p4 Z1 G& S; v* B A( ~" O R
, a; r1 v8 ?# ]1 E/ K0 [ p' \ p
- W& |6 O8 Y2 a
" w. q) d6 e' O% [http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades1 ?( Q4 O, V0 N
Historic Alberta budget balances:
$ T$ i6 v+ q1 T7 O' r) b; \, n; T/ _/ T& f) Z, `- X
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus5 C5 C- {4 b6 r4 Q- W' E
0 H1 @! {: u* H) G% z! Z
1982-83: $796 million deficit, { R$ \4 B+ G8 X2 } G7 H
- [. _1 ^$ A$ k- w, s0 o1983-84: $129 million surplus9 T! u. T- G2 o
/ s/ Q4 F3 V0 p! `9 ?+ F1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
! M& K( I. I2 K7 T! H; |; x' k; p
1985-86: $761 million deficit6 \6 h. U+ v& C; H
0 l8 b) i2 M# I6 _$ u1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit/ a& L, w* P: s. C
1 @" b$ L9 ?' t) X1 h: s
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
4 x) p/ o& ]$ M! `! r- T$ g/ V! `$ q6 c" n) u! L6 i' U: b
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
# |. F) U( a9 j% I. {/ K# B6 ]5 @, m/ y$ j5 ]: O( V: T/ e
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit5 T. b5 l4 g; }$ z& C ?; f
0 T. e5 C- U, I" X1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
$ C* w! Q! P9 w; `. a, P) E1 }, v
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit) K9 e/ O2 ^: U: a; {
5 Q: g3 p S" ~3 ^+ J# X1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
. ?3 j4 Q) ?; D. a+ D* g6 H& A7 P+ {% `2 ? m! x& B
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
' c1 [: ^( X7 ^+ p- D( o) i4 S& s1 u1 i/ [( ]; g# V5 {
1994-95: $938 million surplus$ H* V2 O3 I, k! I2 c, U
5 p" ?+ Q% M# H
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus; ?. o% {; I0 f
$ z. [0 p& L. x9 H9 n* F6 X3 f9 G1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
- K+ I/ { D; \
9 q5 a6 R& B3 ?; [/ R! ^6 K1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
m; X6 r+ t2 Q+ c
' B8 c' U' z- z7 t1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
}: Z- G: G: A0 p) D9 G* B- B# Q2 f! T0 X: S* i
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
3 _1 l& q' N# G6 p6 f- ^; N" J v
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
0 n+ F0 k3 ~& g/ V: R
% Z4 i5 R$ O a2 j6 Q2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
( K4 R; ` ?& S. Z% i+ m
6 Q9 Z/ X/ T9 ?: M2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus' u; {/ Z" j T& D9 n; n8 V. u
0 c$ g6 n* e D- }5 H5 H F2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
# }" q D+ W. X" H @- U
; F; R% n/ K2 z# R0 w2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus; H% n. }" i1 O: N6 K% h
: I& ~) v' P: p9 ^. ~. P
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus1 _6 J. x8 E% U& x+ h
$ c# K% c: [( o' G) d" L' s W* R2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus% `* A# n. X6 C6 l, |$ _* B
8 Q% q. S2 T8 t) }# b, U, x2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
6 y, ?6 `$ B# E: {; @& \
7 E% u: s. C, Q. m2 Q2008-09: $852 million deficit( `" I" `7 ?! S8 z3 a
: p3 j1 j' j& N$ _0 o2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
k7 R0 }: [: w% J# @& T F2 O, C- w) _5 Z, q& W+ z3 _. t
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
: v* }" e: d$ N, }7 I) G4 E9 Z% K& {0 C1 w" U }$ j* s* a7 G2 o/ A
2011-12: $23 million deficit
% i: W6 a5 d/ p* c0 ]' k4 R- P' o8 U1 Z V" u2 Y
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit6 s- R! s- M; q. v0 j. r) }1 V
" n7 f2 \- Z! ]. E2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|