 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
- j$ T1 ] p" R a
3 J9 a |" D1 N5 E9 r! a
7 ]4 J7 a( E$ d2 [+ o$ }7 W3 {你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
" ]# X) ]: X# ^# Z3 ORalph Klein
( T1 d* Y0 ~0 a, V% r9 j
! f' j t5 n5 A我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
$ R5 l8 a1 W$ g; H) S! r
0 l) u, C9 U, y# u+ i( t$ b; M7 |所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
, u, `4 _8 y( {/ ^. w$ A6 S0 q9 v$ f. ^4 M" B0 I
1 g7 r! t" E. o1 O2 n
- @) ^5 |5 ]: j+ ahttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades6 ^# V* C1 V. y, ]0 c
Historic Alberta budget balances:; A$ }- V$ n; B, z# j! D6 i) {
0 O( o8 N0 E5 C8 i' K# V1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus- Y1 [7 e! R: o f' ~0 a* X8 C: o
4 M, G' f- e# _9 C" A6 x% H5 ]. e1982-83: $796 million deficit
7 y+ x+ r/ c2 a# E% f" S- U! M6 X, E. U" Z8 ~+ k5 U
1983-84: $129 million surplus
* {, R8 O' B% c. F2 p0 v
. `( I' s5 X' U8 l) Y/ N q1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
: r$ z8 ^- `4 X+ G+ m L' ~2 w; V" v- r
1985-86: $761 million deficit. y' ]( q3 V: I9 O/ {
* x: G2 v, x! ~& N" L
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit4 {" C3 N+ A1 J; }5 ~
* x& e+ m1 l1 b7 H; Y4 C- o
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit2 w, o' C' v7 r! B3 z8 `
& J$ t0 F9 ]+ t& n8 N) v
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
# t9 ?3 P# k/ a3 E3 `$ @
! g0 D/ b( O' x5 m6 g1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit1 Z% l7 S5 s1 e% ]
+ }9 u- R9 v$ [1 q
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit% T9 w/ M' \5 J( n R" C9 K* Y
; T* o T- w8 H) p {& P$ f
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
1 c( D0 _! B: t; u- N( I% M$ l! a
, u/ P5 Y4 U9 W) b/ ?) c2 D1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
0 H8 s7 Q$ C( q* D F$ l; G
' C$ Q5 c' g% e ^* x1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit9 A! O0 K/ d+ t) ?1 y4 x3 g* X$ W' M
% P) U' T. W: `- m G1994-95: $938 million surplus6 W3 a, A% w! [! R8 L( F
- t' D3 a% }- n
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus# K9 v5 U& Q# q: z- g8 m
8 O$ v( P! D/ r% b
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus& K( |! t( x, y; `
' L$ R2 s- C2 l: W6 m1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
* o/ i. U1 n8 R/ M& u1 e Y$ F2 d# k) d! U3 x1 d
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
! }6 M5 H7 D9 |. B: `" u6 z$ l8 Z: V1 o; g& i6 v
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
" L) t! m( r6 y) b, U
4 e& W% h5 M( a% ~( Z7 z( t. m% e2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus* a# ^6 [$ F- f) i% X# t! F
) ^) P2 l+ ]2 I8 h; t& h( u% z' X
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus1 e6 y9 \, Y* `0 k
1 _3 w- n# s+ J" }# n, l2 |4 S2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus5 G# S4 A. {. P9 t, A% `( p
6 T, |% \: A h' |
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus2 h$ Z5 T- O$ J
! V+ [. O/ h2 v0 P( I2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
1 k2 r' }4 s1 `4 y
( h: _' q7 `, A s0 j$ {5 F' B2 l2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus; ~- s5 \: N% ~/ N8 t8 f
$ Z7 d/ v+ i+ W
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus0 ]6 k; K& [8 e! Y6 S+ ~4 ]' h" ~3 [
1 [; S3 m! q+ \) f. i2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus; \; `* i s4 a, c5 e. X
) @4 o$ ?+ H* M/ b5 O6 R* _# g
2008-09: $852 million deficit
& u/ n, P8 U9 i0 e; u0 U
# G: J, [ K( s, ^4 T% h2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
7 L. x) ?- d% Q' A
* e3 u* ^( P2 v" ?2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit) k5 n: W, V9 x/ I
! ^ x" c; d( g8 e# T2011-12: $23 million deficit8 R1 K1 A; J2 k8 N6 r& e% C
1 p' l# o7 O) x3 g+ a2 Q% t
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
+ O% x* C, P! E2 n8 T: T5 z. a* ?, F& S6 h' G2 N5 \8 Y
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|