 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
5 k2 i7 w4 W7 {+ g, ]$ }3 ~, A
, i! |4 ?) X* o, L# b
5 Q' j! H) X. }If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
# v- [# C7 I# i& [: f" Y, u8 B' q$ M$ ]5 l7 ]
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
* H% `+ n% w8 m, ~* |; f) U9 Y+ {! x4 I1 ]; K! t0 I) S
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
5 i$ x" C7 \/ w) R& C) C/ r* j
( i8 [/ K0 U; f6 W0 w3 g7 B8 T, eNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
6 `, G% S: p, U6 r& O* J5 R |
|