Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
# s6 r4 R- v# |4 Z5 f
: U! ~2 X1 ^; {Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
1 X' {& m! e& c0 k: M/ X. s8 Q; W
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
7 ^, m: e  d$ n3 i

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

# x8 t  C% U* z- o* |) u7 u  s7 LSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
/ u) L1 |& D0 ?) O: {New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
$ U% M* Z6 U8 VYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
& N- |5 F; L2 b8 T; P
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
4 }! m7 d( W* k0 Q4 k% S2 {4 `5 F
- m" Z) P+ P  `' h Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
: @% @3 t/ W5 J3 V2 i" q" L! S Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
0 x% j  V( I, y- ]1 cSan Diego  22.8 29.7
2 R9 p  Z9 j! p, t2 USan Francisco  23.8 27.2
' a! G  a; c1 c9 p: RLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
+ A9 x: j2 ^: ?4 Q  ]Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
: M8 _$ c( o1 H3 a: t
5 K. k& O& {8 E
$ _7 v3 C4 F% w: {, N0 Y: a
' y% Z6 s, L2 L! ]( d4 |6 t, s& Y) g) `It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


. N; C7 o$ t/ e8 p- p( qFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
7 M; u( Z! k4 b" _8 V" l
2 ]# a0 h) w" }8 I9 Hit would be a good reference.
4 H) r3 a" }6 L# u5 r
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

9 {* L6 l# b5 F& x# u# N[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]