Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
) w8 X+ B' j3 r1 q$ ZLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
3 U& ?: E% }  g; S
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
  j9 E0 Z/ G( n' ~
0 ?* B1 \. O7 {, w1 s7 _( Z2 ?3 VLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
; b9 l- F  ?# b' d: U+ J2 M
/ B7 d" [+ o$ A* a
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

  S; ~) G( A2 _1 G" }  A4 |4 {$ WSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
+ T: M* y- \1 b" WSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
. S+ i( F8 z4 l# T' L. ~* uYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

% `. h- A, \7 X! X: i- V: RIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
% z; E& ]+ f0 o5 V, l; ^
" e. s' B' i7 N! O5 e# ^% L6 VIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
, ]- N& ~8 C- Z& Z. h. G- ^
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
9 j6 R, C, K) D: U% L; tBoston  20.5 30.2
# ?5 d6 E) o1 J7 |; h, ^- {$ _San Diego  22.8 29.7
- l3 K. O0 S. i: y+ qSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
4 e6 l  |9 l; T, HSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
$ l3 X- h+ `4 V/ F- Q; N0 N( v7 i& eNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
( w# w9 |  n" {- c8 N& n3 z5 ?Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
2 E# h8 l8 f1 f
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
  a: o6 y6 X1 H$ b9 D- C8 M- N
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]