Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
% q7 Z- o" s5 l2 aLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
5 J0 Y4 a0 E0 g* N5 z0 s+ \
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

3 Q4 ?/ s8 H3 ~" y  s/ `To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


  |0 w( K5 D) X3 t, D; V8 C6 TIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
* S4 o; ?" y. |1 c4 t# R
0 t# r4 i) p, L* N5 mSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
; c5 I& d  i- \  dNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
  T$ ?5 t# [$ z& K  q# N8 K4 tYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
  P% N  p( q( U  ^$ _
5 b9 H( M" {' _" P7 HIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
4 U3 W* D9 G. Y
/ g3 D6 z7 b( `If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

7 z6 {' ]2 n# l$ c Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
3 O+ b4 A* m  \- q7 I% RLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
  p. W% H( k, t$ t7 FSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4


( ^+ ?# S# J8 G7 D; w9 s" _
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
& F/ w8 i" H7 z: Q8 b8 W$ B
. h6 e6 G* i( d) Q# M
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
- J+ w; L; @6 `% N* e
9 U) H! p* J* c9 `it would be a good reference.
, X0 Q9 S' W, I) S6 t$ L
% w6 T5 E1 g$ _3 Z. R, Nthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]